Website review, no card needed

istanbul.com logo

istanbul.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202632 issues · 82 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on istanbul.com, 13 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 171.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
207 ms109 msMay 2Oct 17196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026120 ms
May 9, 2026120 ms
May 16, 2026120 ms
May 23, 2026122 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026128 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026131 ms
Jul 4, 2026133 ms
Jul 11, 2026132 ms
Jul 18, 2026131 ms
Jul 25, 2026133 ms
Aug 1, 2026134 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026143 ms
Aug 22, 2026142 ms
Aug 29, 2026146 ms
Sep 5, 2026151 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026145 ms
Sep 26, 2026150 ms
Oct 3, 2026146 ms
Oct 10, 2026170 ms
Oct 17, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of istanbul.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. istanbul.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. istanbul.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. istanbul.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. istanbul.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. istanbul.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. istanbul.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  7. istanbul.com at 6.9 s6.9 s
  8. istanbul.com at 7.9 s7.9 s

Speed

8 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    8.3 s · 8.3 MB

    53 images could be 8.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.3 s faster on a phone.

  • 6,650 HTML elements

    The page has 6,650 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 507 KiB

    About 507 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (cityberry.com, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 566 KiB and 568 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 325 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (325 KiB).

  • cityberry.com adds 352 ms

    352 ms

    cityberry.com costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 216 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 217 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 62 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 39 ms

    39 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 39 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.1 s

    24.1 s

    Your largest element takes 24.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Background image of travel destination”.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.2 s

    35.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 203 ms

    203 ms

    Real visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 53% slower for real visitors

    +53%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 496 ms

    496 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 496 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 526 ms

    526 ms

    Real visitors wait 526 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 15.3 MB in 176 requests

    15.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 15.3 MB in 176 requests on a phone: images 13.0 MB (83), scripts 1.4 MB (49) and fonts 449 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 18 images far larger than shown

    1.6 MB

    18 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example galata_tower_vertical.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 298 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.

  • 16 images below the first screen load straight away

    16 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.33 g of CO₂e: 519.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 350 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 281 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 281 pages on istanbul.com and 6 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “Book tickets to Istanbul's top attractions, museums, and tours. Skip the line access, instant confirmation, and best pr…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Discover the best of Istanbul.”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Istanbul.com - Best Tickets, Tours & Attractions in Istanbul”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://istanbul.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://istanbul.com/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,055 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://istanbul.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 22 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://istanbul.com/favorites is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://istanbul.com/ru, https://istanbul.com/ar, https://istanbul.com/bg and https://istanbul.com/el have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 172 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    51 of 53 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 4,548 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 4,548 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Download on the App Store”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, PostHog and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at istanbul.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Astro
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | PostHog

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on istanbul.com, including 16 speed issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25