Website review, no card needed
itgetsbetter.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202651 issues · 110 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on itgetsbetter.org, 16 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #56,287 of 81,369 reviewed websitesbeats 27%
- #31,294 of 40,249 online storesbeats 18%
- #1,138 of 2,108 WooCommerce storesbeats 40%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 150 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
13.8 s · 5.5 MB9 images could be 5.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 203 KiBAbout 203 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and TikTok and others), adding 1.7 MB and 878 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 53). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
894 KiBAbout 894 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
YouTube adds 405 ms
405 msYouTube costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 258 ms
258 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 258 ms of main-thread work and 341 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
30 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (30 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.6 s
23.6 sYour largest element takes 23.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 27.7 s
27.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.9 s
8.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 957 ms
957 msReal visitors wait 957 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 230 ms
230 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 230 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 166 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 163 ms
163 msReal visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.088
0.088The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.088, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.0 MB in 133 requests
9.0 MBYour homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 133 requests on a phone: images 6.7 MB (21), scripts 1.9 MB (50) and stylesheets 198 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 5.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
3.1 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example WritingOurOwnDictionary.png at 1,666 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 3.1 MB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (5.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (2.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.55 g of CO₂e: 306.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h4 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 12 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “It Gets Better”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Let LGBTQ+ youth define their own journey.” and “Legacy Partners”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
101 internal links, 26 external
The homepage links to 101 pages on itgetsbetter.org and 26 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://itgetsbetter.org/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://itgetsbetter.org/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (859 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/get-help, /shop, /browse-content, /changemakers, /about/youth-voices and /glossary and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
/changemakers and /queer-spaces-in-unexpected-places have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 third-party cookies
6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
27 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (itgetsbetter.org).
Valid certificate (86 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for itgetsbetter.org and is valid for another 86 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://itgetsbetter.org redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 60 links work
All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
itgetsbetter.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
itgetsbetter.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 19 years old
19 yearsitgetsbetter.org was registered in Jun 2007 through Automattic Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2027
itgetsbetter.org is registered until Jun 2027.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 16 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 754 words of copy
The homepage carries about 754 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop” and “Learn More”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop our Store” and “Learn More”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and TikTok Pixel.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be itgetsbetter.org is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 60/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.createsend.com a mx include:bluestatedigital.com include:_spf.google.com ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snap Pixel and TikTok Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.advanced-dynamic-pricing-for-woocommerce 4.10.5 → 5.0.0
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Company
- Founded
- 2004
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 51 issues on itgetsbetter.org, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.