Website review, no card needed

itq.in logo

itq.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202634 issues · 78 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on itq.in, 15 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce initial server response time. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
273 ms76 msMay 9Sep 19114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026163 ms
May 16, 2026206 ms
May 23, 2026215 ms
May 30, 2026212 ms
Jun 6, 2026250 ms
Jul 11, 2026209 ms
Jul 18, 2026209 ms
Jul 25, 2026209 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026141 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 2026110 ms
Sep 5, 2026115 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of itq.in (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. itq.in at 3.1 s3.1 s
  2. itq.in at 6.2 s6.2 s
  3. itq.in at 9.3 s9.3 s
  4. itq.in at 12.5 s12.5 s
  5. itq.in at 15.6 s15.6 s
  6. itq.in at 18.7 s18.7 s
  7. itq.in at 21.8 s21.8 s
  8. itq.in at 24.9 s24.9 s

Speed

7 to fix41
  • Reduce initial server response time

    1.9 s

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.9 s on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    1.9 s

    The HTML itself could arrive about 1.9 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Your server takes 2.0 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 122 KiB

    About 122 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 53 KiB

    About 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 103 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    69 KiB

    2 images could be 69 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN), adding 6 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “ITQ Products Catalogue”. Most of its time is resource load delay (16.6 s).

  • Speed Index: 29.8 s

    29.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 29.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.459

    0.459

    The layout shifts by 0.459 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 715 ms

    715 ms

    Real visitors wait 715 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 38% faster for real visitors

    -38%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 177 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (433 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.53 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.53 g of CO₂e: 63.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 49 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 49 requests on a phone: images 1,016 KiB (17), scripts 301 KiB (3) and media 265 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8592
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Links must have discernible text (2 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10079
  • Title is long (111 characters)

    Your title is 111 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “ITQ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.| Leading Travel Technology Solutions Provider in India, Sri La…”.

  • 9 H1 headlines

    There are 9 <h1> headlines (“Modern Easy”, “Travel Retailing” and “EASY CUSTOMER SUPPORT”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (283 characters)

    Your meta description is 283 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.itq-website.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 36 internal links, 43 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on itq.in and 43 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://itq.in/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (711 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 16 pages share a title

    /, /company.html, /leadership.html, /careers.html, /agencies.html and /suppliers.html and 10 others all use the title “ITQ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.| Leading Travel Technology Solutions Provi…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    /company.html, /leadership.html, /careers.html, /agencies.html, /suppliers.html and /ndc.html and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /leadership.html and /ndc.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /training.html and /media.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 247 words

    The homepage has only about 247 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Join Us” and “Get in touch”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at itq.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Hosting
TATA Communications formerly VSNL is Leading ISP

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on itq.in, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25