Website review, no card needed

jamsai.com logo

jamsai.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202648 issues · 88 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on jamsai.com, 20 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s909 msApr 25Oct 102.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.2 s
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
331 ms176 msApr 25Oct 10280 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026267 ms
May 2, 2026247 ms
May 9, 2026232 ms
May 16, 2026236 ms
May 23, 2026246 ms
May 30, 2026262 ms
Jun 6, 2026275 ms
Jun 13, 2026282 ms
Jun 20, 2026294 ms
Jun 27, 2026293 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026206 ms
Jul 18, 2026209 ms
Jul 25, 2026208 ms
Aug 1, 2026250 ms
Aug 8, 2026264 ms
Aug 15, 2026265 ms
Aug 22, 2026288 ms
Aug 29, 2026302 ms
Sep 5, 2026312 ms
Sep 12, 2026313 ms
Sep 19, 2026306 ms
Sep 26, 2026308 ms
Oct 3, 2026292 ms
Oct 10, 2026280 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jamsai.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jamsai.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jamsai.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jamsai.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. jamsai.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. jamsai.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. jamsai.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. jamsai.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. jamsai.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

12 to fix43
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    32.5 s · 39.1 MB

    63 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (39.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    31.1 s · 37.6 MB

    69 images could be 37.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 31.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    11.6 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 11.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 18). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8,030 HTML elements

    The page has 8,030 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    930 ms · 534 KiB

    About 534 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 930 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    780 ms · 170 KiB

    About 170 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 780 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 920 KiB and 734 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 352 ms

    352 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 488 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 46 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 285 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 46.3 s

    46.3 s

    Your largest element takes 46.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 46.3 s

    46.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 46.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 397 ms

    397 ms

    Real visitors wait 397 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 944 ms

    944 ms

    Real visitors wait 944 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 478 ms

    478 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 478 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 267 ms to 280 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021

    0.021

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix14
  • Page weight: 42.7 MB in 158 requests

    42.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 42.7 MB in 158 requests on a phone: images 39.1 MB (75), fonts 1.7 MB (12) and scripts 1.4 MB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images over 500 KB

    11 images weigh 15.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 20 images far larger than shown

    14.7 MB

    20 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1791963088364_สังหารรัชทายาท-01. at 4,000 px wide, shown at 382 px. Resized copies would save about 14.7 MB.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (14.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    1790766873440_Banner NEWArtboard 5.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 12.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    12.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 12.09 g of CO₂e: 1451.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 190 buttons without a name

    190 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 21 text elements with low contrast

    21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 26 images without alt text

    26 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (529 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 529 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 39 links without text

    39 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8576
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 608 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 608 pages on jamsai.com and 7 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Home - Jamsai Store | ร้านหนังสือออนไลน์ คลังนิยายแจ่มใส”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jamsai.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jamsai.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jamsai.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,426 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 10 pages share a meta description

    https://www.jamsai.com/tracking, https://www.jamsai.com/wishlist, https://www.jamsai.com/shop, https://www.jamsai.com/shop/best-sellers, https://www.jamsai.com/shop/new-arrivals and https://www.jamsai.com/shop/coming-soon and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.jamsai.com/tracking, https://www.jamsai.com/wishlist, https://www.jamsai.com/product-details/9786160629633/- and https://www.jamsai.com/product-details/9786160630813/jiraphatjapendekdee-1 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.jamsai.com/shop/coming-soon took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 195 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 44 small tap targets

    44 of 177 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 41 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 655 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 655 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “How to order”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Pre-Sale & Pre-Order”, “Book Deal Guild” and “How to order”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jamsai.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on jamsai.com, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25