Website review, no card needed
jaw.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202655 issues · 103 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on jaw.pl, 17 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 31. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 68). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (ay.delivery, consentmanager.net and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
450 ms · 704 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (704 KiB).
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 519 KiB11 images could be 519 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
Avoid multiple page redirects
758 msThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 758 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
ay.delivery adds 629 ms
629 msay.delivery costs a phone 629 ms of main-thread work and 553 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
566 KiBAbout 566 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
consentmanager.net adds 485 ms
485 msconsentmanager.net costs a phone 485 ms of main-thread work and 176 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
500 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 500 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 386 ms
386 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 386 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 4.0 s
A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Facebook adds 270 ms
270 msFacebook costs a phone 270 ms of main-thread work and 268 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 34 KiBAbout 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
37 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 68 but mobile only 31. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 410 ms
410 msYour server sent the HTML in 410 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 18.2 s
18.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sYour largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ŻYCIE MIASTA 9 37 Kontrole na cmentarzu. To efekt donosów o…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.443
0.443The layout shifts by 0.443 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
33 images without width and height
33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.1 s
4.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 193 ms
193 msReal visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 532 ms
532 msReal visitors wait 532 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.9 MB in 124 requests
5.9 MBYour homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (67), scripts 1.7 MB (29) and fonts 304 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
42 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example NA_STRONE_21.png at 908 px wide, shown at 140 px. Resized copies would save about 42 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (146 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (93 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.67 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.67 g of CO₂e: 200.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
25 text elements with low contrast
25 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name (3 elements)
ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
19 images without alt text
19 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (58 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 58 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
480 internal links, 26 external
The homepage links to 480 pages on jaw.pl and 26 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 123 characters
Your meta description is 123 characters: “Jaw.pl - Portal, Gazeta Co Tydzień, telewizja kablowa. Katalog firm, ogłoszenia, praca - Jaworznicki Portal Społecznośc…”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Jaworzno wiadomości, Jaworznicki Portal Społecznościowy - jaw.pl”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://jaw.pl/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: NewsMediaOrganization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jaw.pl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler
1 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No llms.txt
There is no https://jaw.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
2 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,221 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://jaw.pl/app-redirect.amp has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
4 linked pages hidden from search
https://jaw.pl/dodajogloszenie, https://jaw.pl/alert, https://jaw.pl/wiadomosci and https://jaw.pl/reels are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages share a title
/, https://jaw.pl/alert and https://jaw.pl/reels all use the title “Jaworzno wiadomości, Jaworznicki Portal Społecznościowy - jaw.pl”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://jaw.pl/app-redirect.amp, https://jaw.pl/dodajogloszenie, https://jaw.pl/alert and https://jaw.pl/reels have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://jaw.pl/app-redirect.amp, https://jaw.pl/dodajogloszenie and https://jaw.pl/reels have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
7 pages slow to respond
https://jaw.pl/pogoda, https://jaw.pl/ogloszenia, https://jaw.pl/ogloszenia/praca, https://jaw.pl/ogloszenia/nieruchomosci, https://jaw.pl/wydarzenia-imprezy and https://jaw.pl/alert and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn.cmc-gallery.pl/static/app/img/app_ios_150.gif.
14 small tap targets
14 of 48 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE.NotSameOrigin”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 879 words of copy
The homepage carries about 879 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start”.
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Start”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
34 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: consentmanager
A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jaw.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- CMCMedia 4.09
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on jaw.pl, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.