Website review, no card needed

jaw.pl logo

jaw.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202655 issues · 103 checks

This review found 55 issues worth fixing on jaw.pl, 17 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 31. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.1 sMay 2Oct 171.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.2 s
May 9, 20261.2 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
160 ms107 msMay 2Oct 17154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026122 ms
May 16, 2026123 ms
May 23, 2026123 ms
May 30, 2026118 ms
Jun 6, 2026115 ms
Jun 13, 2026113 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026116 ms
Jul 4, 2026115 ms
Jul 11, 2026118 ms
Jul 18, 2026118 ms
Jul 25, 2026120 ms
Aug 1, 2026125 ms
Aug 8, 2026126 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026133 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026145 ms
Oct 3, 2026153 ms
Oct 10, 2026154 ms
Oct 17, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jaw.pl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jaw.pl at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. jaw.pl at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. jaw.pl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. jaw.pl at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. jaw.pl at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. jaw.pl at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. jaw.pl at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. jaw.pl at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

14 to fix31
  • Mobile performance score: 31

    31/100

    Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 68). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (ay.delivery, consentmanager.net and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 704 KiB

    29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (704 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    550 ms · 519 KiB

    11 images could be 519 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    758 ms

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 758 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • ay.delivery adds 629 ms

    629 ms

    ay.delivery costs a phone 629 ms of main-thread work and 553 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    566 KiB

    About 566 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • consentmanager.net adds 485 ms

    485 ms

    consentmanager.net costs a phone 485 ms of main-thread work and 176 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Document request latency

    500 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 500 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 386 ms

    386 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 386 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 4.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Facebook adds 270 ms

    270 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 270 ms of main-thread work and 268 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 68 but mobile only 31. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 410 ms

    410 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 410 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Your largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ŻYCIE MIASTA 9 37 Kontrole na cmentarzu. To efekt donosów o…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.443

    0.443

    The layout shifts by 0.443 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 33 images without width and height

    33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 193 ms

    193 ms

    Real visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 532 ms

    532 ms

    Real visitors wait 532 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.9 MB in 124 requests

    5.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (67), scripts 1.7 MB (29) and fonts 304 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    42 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example NA_STRONE_21.png at 908 px wide, shown at 140 px. Resized copies would save about 42 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (146 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (93 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.67 g of CO₂e: 200.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7283
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 25 text elements with low contrast

    25 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name (3 elements)

    ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 19 images without alt text

    19 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (58 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 58 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8592
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 480 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 480 pages on jaw.pl and 26 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 123 characters

    Your meta description is 123 characters: “Jaw.pl - Portal, Gazeta Co Tydzień, telewizja kablowa. Katalog firm, ogłoszenia, praca - Jaworznicki Portal Społecznośc…”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Jaworzno wiadomości, Jaworznicki Portal Społecznościowy - jaw.pl”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jaw.pl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: NewsMediaOrganization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jaw.pl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://jaw.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,221 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix60
  • 1 page without a title

    https://jaw.pl/app-redirect.amp has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 4 linked pages hidden from search

    https://jaw.pl/dodajogloszenie, https://jaw.pl/alert, https://jaw.pl/wiadomosci and https://jaw.pl/reels are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://jaw.pl/alert and https://jaw.pl/reels all use the title “Jaworzno wiadomości, Jaworznicki Portal Społecznościowy - jaw.pl”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://jaw.pl/app-redirect.amp, https://jaw.pl/dodajogloszenie, https://jaw.pl/alert and https://jaw.pl/reels have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://jaw.pl/app-redirect.amp, https://jaw.pl/dodajogloszenie and https://jaw.pl/reels have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://jaw.pl/pogoda, https://jaw.pl/ogloszenia, https://jaw.pl/ogloszenia/praca, https://jaw.pl/ogloszenia/nieruchomosci, https://jaw.pl/wydarzenia-imprezy and https://jaw.pl/alert and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 6969
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn.cmc-gallery.pl/static/app/img/app_ios_150.gif.

  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 48 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE.NotSameOrigin”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 879 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 879 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Start”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 34 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jaw.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
CMCMedia 4.09
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 55 issues on jaw.pl, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25