Website review, no card needed

jcc.co.uk logo

jcc.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202630 issues · 84 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on jcc.co.uk, 11 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms87 msMay 2Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202689 ms
May 9, 202692 ms
May 16, 202690 ms
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202693 ms
Jun 6, 202692 ms
Jun 13, 202692 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202689 ms
Jul 4, 202690 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202693 ms
Aug 1, 202693 ms
Aug 8, 202691 ms
Aug 15, 202691 ms
Aug 22, 202691 ms
Aug 29, 202690 ms
Sep 5, 202693 ms
Sep 12, 202693 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202691 ms
Oct 3, 202690 ms
Oct 10, 202693 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jcc.co.uk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jcc.co.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jcc.co.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jcc.co.uk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. jcc.co.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. jcc.co.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. jcc.co.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. jcc.co.uk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. jcc.co.uk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix61
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.2 s · 649 KiB

    86 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (649 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.3 s · 231 KiB

    About 231 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and coveo.com and others), adding 9.6 MB and 304 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Adobe Scene7 adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Adobe Scene7 costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 8.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    280 KiB

    9 images could be 280 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,596 HTML elements

    The page has 1,596 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    260 ms · 44 KiB

    About 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 92 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 479 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 89 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 91 ms

    91 ms

    Real visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 361 ms

    361 ms

    Real visitors wait 361 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.046

    0.046

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.046, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 79 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 10.5 MB in 102 requests

    10.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.5 MB in 102 requests on a phone: media 8.7 MB (1), scripts 854 KiB (56) and images 470 KiB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    V50 Pro Anti-Glare.jpg weighs 604 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.97 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.97 g of CO₂e: 356.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8691
  • 24 text elements with low contrast

    24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8595
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 215 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 215 pages on jcc.co.uk and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “LED Lighting products for the home, office, school & retail sectors. Commercial & domestic lighting solutions including…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Linear Lighting Systems”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “JCC Lighting | Domestic and commercial LED lighting”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jcc.co.uk/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jcc.co.uk/sitemap-products.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://jcc.co.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (854 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://jcc.co.uk/catalogue-request-form, https://jcc.co.uk/support/find-a-jcc-stockist, https://jcc.co.uk/products/fire-rated-downlights/x50, https://jcc.co.uk/products/fire-rated-downlights/v50, https://jcc.co.uk/products/fire-rated-downlights/v50-pro-retrofit and https://jcc.co.uk/products/fire-rated-downlights/v50-pro-anti-glare and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://jcc.co.uk/catalogue-request-form and https://jcc.co.uk/support/find-a-jcc-stockist have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 116 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 434 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 434 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Catalogue Request Form”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jcc.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on jcc.co.uk, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25