Website review, no card needed
jea.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202636 issues · 58 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on jea.com, 16 of them high impact, across 58 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 141 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.7 s · 842 KiBAbout 842 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Avoid multiple page redirects
4.1 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 4.1 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 323 KiBAbout 323 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
1.1 s · 214 KiB214 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
910 ms · 94 KiB94 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 63). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 975 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.6 s
A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 24 ms
24 msYour server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 10.0 s
10.0 sThe first text or image appears after 10.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.5 s
26.5 sYour largest element takes 26.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 26.6 s
26.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.0 s
10.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 104 ms
104 msReal visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 556 ms
556 msReal visitors wait 556 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 183 ms
183 msScripts block the page for only 183 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 94 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 94 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (17), scripts 1.7 MB (40) and stylesheets 378 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 147.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
SEO
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.jea.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at jea.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.jea.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Best practices
No mobile viewport
No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 36 words
The homepage has only about 36 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 other company contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jea.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Company
- Founded
- 1968
- Headquarters
- Jacksonville
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on jea.com, including 13 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.