Website review, no card needed

jettax.com.br logo

jettax.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202640 issues · 82 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on jettax.com.br, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 172.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
321 ms178 msMay 2Oct 17259 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026304 ms
May 9, 2026304 ms
May 16, 2026283 ms
May 23, 2026254 ms
May 30, 2026245 ms
Jun 6, 2026222 ms
Jun 13, 2026224 ms
Jun 20, 2026216 ms
Jun 27, 2026208 ms
Jul 4, 2026211 ms
Jul 11, 2026205 ms
Jul 18, 2026203 ms
Jul 25, 2026194 ms
Aug 1, 2026194 ms
Aug 8, 2026195 ms
Aug 15, 2026205 ms
Aug 22, 2026210 ms
Aug 29, 2026210 ms
Sep 5, 2026219 ms
Sep 12, 2026229 ms
Sep 19, 2026243 ms
Sep 26, 2026250 ms
Oct 3, 2026251 ms
Oct 10, 2026250 ms
Oct 17, 2026259 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jettax.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jettax.com.br at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jettax.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jettax.com.br at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. jettax.com.br at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. jettax.com.br at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. jettax.com.br at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. jettax.com.br at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. jettax.com.br at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

9 to fix70
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    29 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and RD Station and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 70). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    707 KiB

    About 707 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 367 ms

    367 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 367 ms of main-thread work and 771 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    412 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (412 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,931 HTML elements

    The page has 1,931 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 32 KiB

    3 images could be 32 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 197 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    64 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 64 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 142 ms

    142 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 142 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.5 s

    18.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 302 ms

    302 ms

    Real visitors wait 302 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 550 ms

    550 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 550 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Your largest element takes 3.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 304 ms to 259 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 156 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 156 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (50), media 1.5 MB (1) and images 938 KiB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (641 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.33 g of CO₂e: 159.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8291
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (51 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 51 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 55 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 55 passed and 9 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8394
  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at jettax.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 65 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 65 pages on jettax.com.br and 10 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 113 characters

    Your meta description is 113 characters: “Automatize suas rotinas e seja uma contabilidade digital com nossa plataforma. Saiba mais sobre automação fiscal.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “A integração que todo usuário da Domínio esperava, chegou.”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Jettax | Automação fiscal para escritórios contábeis”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jettax.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jettax.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,784 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.jettax.com.br/llms.txt (3 KiB, 22 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.jettax.com.br/jettax-ia, https://www.jettax.com.br/blog/colunistas and https://www.jettax.com.br/blog/category/fiscal-news have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,115 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,115 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jettax.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on jettax.com.br, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25