Website review, no card needed
jhm.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202652 issues · 92 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on jhm.org, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 134 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
23.3 s · 29.1 MB23 images could be 29.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 23.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
19.7 s · 23.4 MB86 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (23.4 MB).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 41). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.9 s
A phone's processor spends 7.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and npaw.com and others), adding 38.5 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
620 ms · 2.4 MBAbout 2.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.
JSDelivr CDN adds 736 ms
736 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 736 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
550 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).
npaw.com adds 459 ms
459 msnpaw.com costs a phone 459 ms of main-thread work and 629 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
s73cloud.com adds 385 ms
385 mss73cloud.com costs a phone 385 ms of main-thread work and 388 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 377 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
310 ms · 53 KiBAbout 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 255 ms
255 msFacebook costs a phone 255 ms of main-thread work and 261 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
64 KiB64 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.8 s
27.8 sYour largest element takes 27.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Biblical Truth. Everlasting Love.”.
Time to Interactive: 45.6 s
45.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 45.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.9 s
2.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 11.4 s
11.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 945 ms
945 msReal visitors wait 945 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
34 images without width and height
34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 161 ms
161 msReal visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 39.6 MB in 210 requests
39.6 MBYour homepage downloads 39.6 MB in 210 requests on a phone: images 30.3 MB (55), scripts 4.6 MB (65) and other files 2.9 MB (66). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
15 images over 500 KB
15 images weigh 28.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
11 images far larger than shown
16.1 MB11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example the-power-to-get-wealth.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 16.1 MB.
23 images in older formats
23 images (30.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (27.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 11.2 g of CO₂ per visit
11.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 11.23 g of CO₂e: 1347.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Frames without titles
4 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
24 images without alt text
24 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
21 links without text
21 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
32 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Hagee Ministries”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Biblical Truth. Everlasting Love.”, “All the Gospel,to All the World,and to Every Gene…” and “Our Leadership”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.jhm.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at jhm.org/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
54 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 54 pages on jhm.org and 8 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 119 characters
Your meta description is 119 characters: “Our purpose at Hagee Ministries is to bring the lost to Jesus Christ while encouraging those who are already believers.”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.jhm.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (708 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.jhm.org/daily-devotionals and https://www.jhm.org/articles use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://www.jhm.org/mattandkendal has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://www.jhm.org/sunday-conversation, https://www.jhm.org/daily-devotionals and https://www.jhm.org/events have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=56207939&Ver=2&mid=8df00409-1d64-4cdc-87a0-e09b8fb41b26&bo=1&sid=01152490d08711f19919f7474a3de889&vid=01154ee0d08711f187fd1bed51f9a923&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 small tap target
1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 819 words of copy
The homepage carries about 819 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Register to Vote” and “Pledge to Register”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
56 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 56 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jhm.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on jhm.org, including 24 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.