Programmable

Website review, no card needed

jkgroup.net logo

jkgroup.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202619 issues · 72 checks

This review found 19 issues worth fixing on jkgroup.net, 5 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

80B

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s2.5 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
204 ms144 msMay 9Oct 24175 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026187 ms
May 16, 2026191 ms
May 23, 2026169 ms
May 30, 2026175 ms
Jun 6, 2026165 ms
Jun 13, 2026167 ms
Jul 4, 2026176 ms
Jul 11, 2026156 ms
Jul 18, 2026166 ms
Jul 25, 2026197 ms
Aug 1, 2026172 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026169 ms
Aug 22, 2026174 ms
Aug 29, 2026179 ms
Sep 5, 2026160 ms
Sep 12, 2026163 ms
Sep 19, 2026153 ms
Sep 26, 2026151 ms
Oct 3, 2026156 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026172 ms
Oct 24, 2026175 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

jkgroup.net (opens in a new tab)
Full-page screenshot of jkgroup.net (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jkgroup.net at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jkgroup.net at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. jkgroup.net at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. jkgroup.net at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. jkgroup.net at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. jkgroup.net at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. jkgroup.net at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. jkgroup.net at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

1 to fix100

  • 1,698 HTML elements

    The page has 1,698 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    62 KiB

    2 images could be 62 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (YouTube), adding 1 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

3 checks passed

  • Mobile performance score: 100

    100/100

    Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 34 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 79 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix33

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.84

    0.84

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.84 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user INP: 227 ms

    227 ms

    Real visitors wait 227 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 175 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed

  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Speed Index: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.2 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Woven Garments”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.2 s.

Images and page weight

100

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.24 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.24 g of CO₂e: 28.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed

  • Page weight: 868 KiB in 59 requests

    868 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 868 KiB in 59 requests on a phone: other files 610 KiB (50), HTML 102 KiB (1) and images 99 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9097

  • 28 links without text

    28 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed

  • Every image has alt text

    All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9278

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Home - J.K. Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 202 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 202 pages on jkgroup.net and 7 external pages.

5 checks passed

  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “J.K. Group - J.K. Spinning Mills Ltd. started implementation of its 4th Spinning Unit to enhance its capacity to 202,08…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jkgroup.net/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jkgroup.net/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://jkgroup.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,045 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://jkgroup.net/products, https://jkgroup.net/yarn-division, https://jkgroup.net/fabric-division, https://jkgroup.net/fabric-division/home-textile, https://jkgroup.net/fabric-division/institutional-textile and https://jkgroup.net/fabric-division/institutional-textile/healthcare-textile and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed

  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693

  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed

  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58

  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 561 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 561 words of visible text.

3 checks passed

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Offices & Contact Details” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jkgroup.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Hostinger

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 19 issues on jkgroup.net, including 7 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25