Website review, no card needed
jofit.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202643 issues · 91 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on jofit.com, 20 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #76,697 of 108,868 reviewed websitesbeats 26%
- #48,393 of 61,767 online storesbeats 18%
- #45,577 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 16%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 195 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.7 s · 1.1 MB7 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 863 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.9 s
A phone's processor spends 9.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, SearchSpring and Yotpo and others), adding 2.9 MB and 3.7 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 799 KiB38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (799 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
900 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
SearchSpring adds 573 ms
573 msSearchSpring costs a phone 573 ms of main-thread work and 116 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Yotpo adds 416 ms
416 msYotpo costs a phone 416 ms of main-thread work and 501 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 409 ms
409 msFacebook costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 271 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
rebuyengine.com adds 332 ms
332 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 332 ms of main-thread work and 697 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 357 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,564 HTML elements
The page has 1,564 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 97 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 97 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
40 ms · 128 KiBAbout 128 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 40 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
40 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.4 s
10.4 sYour largest element takes 10.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Image”.
Time to Interactive: 41.3 s
41.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.7 s
2.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 10.4 s
10.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 195 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 151 ms
151 msReal visitors wait 151 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 654 ms
654 msReal visitors wait 654 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.043
0.043The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.043, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.9 MB in 286 requests
7.9 MBYour homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 286 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (99), other files 2.9 MB (135) and images 1.4 MB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
2026_10_02__Hero_Fairway_Fizz_banner_008_A7R06586.jpg weighs 890 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
755 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 2026_10_02__Hero_Fairway_Fizz_banner_008_A7R06586.jpg at 3,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 755 KiB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
2026_10_02__Shop_Bottoms_360x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (890 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (37 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 267.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links must have discernible text (2 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Jofit” and “Jofit”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
123 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 123 pages on jofit.com and 13 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Jofit provides meticulously crafted garments for women of all shapes and sizes! Add to your wardrobe with luxurious wom…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://jofit.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jofit.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (635 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://jofit.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without a title
https://jofit.com/collections/performance-pro-jacket-2, https://jofit.com/collections/new-arrivals, https://jofit.com/collections/bottoms, https://jofit.com/collections/womens-leggings, https://jofit.com/collections/womens-athletic-pants and https://jofit.com/collections/womens-athletic-shorts and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 pages without a meta description
https://jofit.com/collections/performance-pro-jacket-2 and https://jofit.com/collections/leisure-bottoms have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=56017949&Ver=2&mid=a8254c92-b013-4935-9686-ea328750d839&bo=1&sid=42ac6790ddf111f187f29192e880c2cb&vid=42ac86c0ddf111f1aa9ed90dffbb6c82&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 408 words of copy
The homepage carries about 408 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “START THE PROCESS” and “Catalog Request Form”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
31 cookies set on arrival
31Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
59 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 59 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jofit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Yotpo Product Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Redo · Yotpo Loyalty Rewards · Rebuy Personalization Engine · crazyegg.com · rise-ai.com · azureedge.net · rebuyengine.com · Swym Wishlist Plus
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Bryn Athyn
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on jofit.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.