Website review, no card needed
joinleland.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202633 issues · 78 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on joinleland.com, 12 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Leland
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 318 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 315 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 310 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 369 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 377 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 412 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 407 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 400 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 400 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 444 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 479 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 504 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 522 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 511 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 511 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 510 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 517 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 528 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 529 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.3 s
3.5 s
4.6 s
5.8 s
6.9 s
8.1 s
9.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.5 s
A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 2.9 MB71 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (TikTok, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 982 KiB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 769 KiBAbout 769 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
681 KiB14 images could be 681 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
TikTok adds 379 ms
379 msTikTok costs a phone 379 ms of main-thread work and 292 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 397 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 329 ms
329 msFacebook costs a phone 329 ms of main-thread work and 284 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,966 HTML elements
The page has 2,966 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Hubspot adds 275 ms
275 msHubspot costs a phone 275 ms of main-thread work and 140 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 99 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 99 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 31 KiBAbout 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 24.3 s
24.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.2 s
8.2 sYour largest element takes 8.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s
1.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 8.7 s
8.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 474 ms
474 msReal visitors wait 474 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 67% slower for real visitors
+67%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 318 ms to 529 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 52% slower for real visitors
+52%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 5.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
35 images without width and height
35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.2 MB in 195 requests
6.2 MBYour homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 195 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (52), scripts 2.2 MB (82) and media 810 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (21 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.75 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.75 g of CO₂e: 210.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
535 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 535 pages on joinleland.com and 22 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Leland is a marketplace for ambitious people to access the coaching, classes, and community they need to reach career a…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Own your future”.
Title: 30 characters
Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Reach Ambitious Goals | Leland”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.joinleland.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.joinleland.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.joinleland.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,840 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
12 pages without a meta description
https://www.joinleland.com/build-with-ai, https://www.joinleland.com/break-into-ai-careers, https://www.joinleland.com/mba, https://www.joinleland.com/management-consulting, https://www.joinleland.com/product-management and https://www.joinleland.com/gre and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 173 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
22 of 23 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 874 words of copy
The homepage carries about 874 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join” and “Get started”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Join”, “Get started” and “Learn more”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
35 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at joinleland.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 191 open roles
- Teams
- Coaches (184), Marketing (3), Sales (2), Engineering (1)
- Job board
- ashby
- Careers page
- www.joinleland.com/career (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on joinleland.com, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.