Website review, no card needed

joker.com.tr logo

joker.com.tr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202643 issues · 85 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on joker.com.tr, 15 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 24.1 MB in 235 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms112 msMay 9Oct 24135 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026123 ms
May 16, 2026122 ms
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026119 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026120 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026126 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026123 ms
Jul 18, 2026126 ms
Jul 25, 2026125 ms
Aug 1, 2026132 ms
Aug 8, 2026140 ms
Aug 15, 2026144 ms
Aug 22, 2026146 ms
Aug 29, 2026146 ms
Sep 5, 2026141 ms
Sep 12, 2026144 ms
Sep 19, 2026144 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026135 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of joker.com.tr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. joker.com.tr at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. joker.com.tr at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. joker.com.tr at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. joker.com.tr at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. joker.com.tr at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. joker.com.tr at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. joker.com.tr at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. joker.com.tr at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix50
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 504 KiB

    About 504 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • 3,331 HTML elements

    The page has 3,331 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Shopify and others), adding 669 KiB and 905 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 727 KiB

    30 images could be 727 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 711 ms

    711 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 711 ms of main-thread work and 519 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 281 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    31 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (31 KiB).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Your largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Slide 1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.4 s

    11.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 508 ms

    508 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 508 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 151 ms

    151 ms

    Real visitors wait 151 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 24.1 MB in 235 requests

    24.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 24.1 MB in 235 requests on a phone: media 21.2 MB (2), images 1.2 MB (65) and other files 839 KiB (93). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    hero-slider-image-3.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 6.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.84 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.84 g of CO₂e: 821.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8188
  • 27 text elements with low contrast

    27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 15 tap targets too small

    15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (10 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (15 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9274
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “Joker Baby”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (219 characters)

    Your meta description is 219 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 328 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 328 pages on joker.com.tr and 25 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.joker.com.tr/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.joker.com.tr/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,310 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.joker.com.tr/llms.txt (5 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/sikca-sorulan-sorular, https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/iletisim, https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/magazalarimiz, https://www.joker.com.tr/blogs/haberler and https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/markalar have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/sikca-sorulan-sorular, https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/iletisim, https://www.joker.com.tr/blogs/haberler and https://www.joker.com.tr/pages/markalar have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 110 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 127 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,349 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,349 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 29 short forms

    29 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 31 testimonial or review blocks, 16 customer or partner logos and 14 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at joker.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Turkey

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on joker.com.tr, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25