Website review, no card needed
jonesthegrocer.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202645 issues · 88 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on jonesthegrocer.com, 13 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 112 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.4 s
3.6 s
4.8 s
6.0 s
7.2 s
8.4 s
9.6 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.7 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.
Improve image delivery
2.3 s · 438 KiB7 images could be 438 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 320 KiBAbout 320 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Clarity and others), adding 710 KiB and 626 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce initial server response time
656 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 656 ms on a phone.
Document request latency
650 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 650 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Google Tag Manager adds 475 ms
475 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 475 ms of main-thread work and 526 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.4 s
A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,634 HTML elements
The page has 1,634 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 756 ms
756 msYour server takes 756 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 202 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 39 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (39 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.4 s
12.4 sYour largest element takes 12.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Santa's grotto”. Most of its time is resource load delay (6.0 s).
Speed Index: 16.4 s
16.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.4 s
12.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 292 ms
292 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 292 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 109 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
6 images in older formats
6 images (472 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (169 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.42 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.42 g of CO₂e: 50.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.5 MB in 68 requests
1.5 MBYour homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 68 requests on a phone: scripts 770 KiB (26), images 626 KiB (13) and HTML 66 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values (1 element).
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names (3 elements).
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
32 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
202 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 202 pages on jonesthegrocer.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 139 characters
Your meta description is 139 characters: “Cooking and baking honest food and brewing good coffee everyday. Shop artisan grocery, cheese, meat and gifts not in yo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “well hello there...welcome to jones the grocer”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Jones the Grocer, gourmet food for everyday living”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/sitemap-index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (616 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/wishlist is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/wishlist and https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/map all use the title “Jones the Grocer”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/wishlist and https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/map have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
11 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 11 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/shop-now-2021-i221, whose canonical is https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/shop-now-i221. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/wishlist and https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/shop-now-2021-i221 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages slow to respond
https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/cookies, https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/map, https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/shop-now-2021-i221, https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/cheese-box-c470, https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/products-c1/from-our-cheese-room-c81 and https://www.jonesthegrocer.com/products-c1/charcuterie-deli-bakery-c87 and 8 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 138 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
15 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 175 words
The homepage has only about 175 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “shop now uae”, “View All shop now uae” and “Buy”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jonesthegrocer.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on jonesthegrocer.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.