Website review, no card needed
jpinfra.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202651 issues · 112 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on jpinfra.com, 17 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 213 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.5 s
3.8 s
5.0 s
6.3 s
7.6 s
8.8 s
10.1 s
jpinfra.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 993 KiBAbout 993 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.5 s
A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 9.1 MB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.1 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, chat360.io and Clarity and others), adding 1.9 MB and 974 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
894 KiB24 images could be 894 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Font display
600 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 308 ms
308 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 308 ms of main-thread work and 372 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
chat360.io adds 220 ms
220 mschat360.io costs a phone 220 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 161 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
142 KiBAbout 142 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 32 ms
32 msYour server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.30
0.30For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.3 s
14.3 sYour largest element takes 14.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner-0”.
Speed Index: 21.1 s
21.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 21.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 39.7 s
39.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sThe first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 221 ms
221 msReal visitors wait 221 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 45% slower for real visitors
+45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 213 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.223
0.223The layout shifts by 0.223 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
26 images without width and height
26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 317 ms
317 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 317 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.1 MB in 140 requests
14.1 MBYour homepage downloads 14.1 MB in 140 requests on a phone: images 11.3 MB (61), scripts 1.9 MB (25) and fonts 576 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
23 images below the first screen load straight away
23 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
9 images far larger than shown
210 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5_Introducing_Icons_71_900_550_028d43be7b.webp at 1,876 px wide, shown at 315 px. Resized copies would save about 210 KiB.
About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit
3.99 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.99 g of CO₂e: 479.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
42 tap targets too small
42 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (5 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h6 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
32 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (292 characters)
Your meta description is 292 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
7 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 7 pages on jpinfra.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “JP Infra – Trusted Mumbai Real Estate Developer Since 2006”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.jpinfra.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: LocalBusiness, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jpinfra.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
3 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (479 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (3 KiB, 30 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without an H1
/projects, /pushing-boundaries and /about-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
/projects, /pushing-boundaries and /about-us have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 internal pages checked
We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 small tap target
1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (jpinfra.com).
Valid certificate (38 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for jpinfra.com and is valid for another 38 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://jpinfra.com redirects to the secure version.
All 14 links work
All 14 links checked from your homepage (4 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
jpinfra.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
jpinfra.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 20 years old
20 yearsjpinfra.com was registered in May 2006 through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
jpinfra.com is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 11 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 584 words of copy
The homepage carries about 584 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Apply”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be jpinfra.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.m3c.in include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.defaultmx.com mx include:_spf.salesforce.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Contabo Asia Private Limited
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on jpinfra.com, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.