Website review, no card needed

jtsa.edu logo

jtsa.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202630 issues · 83 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on jtsa.edu, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms90 msMay 9Oct 2499 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026131 ms
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026124 ms
May 30, 2026127 ms
Jun 6, 2026128 ms
Jun 13, 2026132 ms
Jun 20, 2026134 ms
Jun 27, 2026134 ms
Jul 4, 2026134 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026131 ms
Jul 25, 2026130 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026112 ms
Aug 22, 2026105 ms
Aug 29, 202698 ms
Sep 5, 202699 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 202697 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 202696 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 2026100 ms
Oct 24, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jtsa.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jtsa.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jtsa.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jtsa.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. jtsa.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. jtsa.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. jtsa.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. jtsa.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. jtsa.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 670 KiB

    About 670 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.8 s

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.8 s · 498 KiB

    About 498 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 367 KiB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (367 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 330 KiB

    6 images could be 330 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 555 ms

    555 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 555 ms of main-thread work and 663 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 121 ms

    121 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 121 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 239 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    20 ms · 4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 954 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.1 s

    19.1 s

    Your largest element takes 19.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Inspiring the Jewish World”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.1 s

    19.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 923 ms

    923 ms

    Real visitors wait 923 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 523 ms

    523 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 523 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 106 ms

    106 ms

    Real visitors wait 106 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 131 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 164 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 164 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (45), stylesheets 525 KiB (10) and images 516 KiB (45). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    20 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example hero_optimized.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 20 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (412 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (272 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 13 links with vague text

    13 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 144 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 144 pages on jtsa.edu and 7 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Jewish Theological Seminary provides lifelong learning and professional development to alumni, adult learners, and Jewi…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Inspiring the Jewish World”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Jewish Theological Seminary - Inspiring the Jewish World”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jtsa.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, CollegeOrUniversity, ImageObject, Organization and Person.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jtsa.edu/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jtsa.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (965 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.jtsa.edu/ways-to-give, https://www.jtsa.edu/leadership, https://www.jtsa.edu/history-of-jts, https://www.jtsa.edu/jts-and-israel and https://www.jtsa.edu/offices-resources have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.jtsa.edu/admissions and https://www.jtsa.edu/contact use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.jtsa.edu/ways-to-give and https://www.jtsa.edu/jts-and-israel have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 105 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 6991
  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 659 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 659 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY” and “CONTACT”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Contact” and “Library Book Talks and Exhibits”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jtsa.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WP Engine

Company

Employees
218
Founded
1886
Headquarters
New York City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on jtsa.edu, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25