Website review, no card needed
jurlique.hk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202641 issues · 87 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on jurlique.hk, 20 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 735 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 714 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 692 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 645 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 614 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 651 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 661 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 743 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 764 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 734 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 690 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 705 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 670 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 709 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 739 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 619 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 619 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 605 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 556 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 666 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 658 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 704 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 714 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 683 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 668 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 67 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 73 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 70 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.0 s
3.0 s
4.1 s
5.1 s
6.1 s
7.1 s
8.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.8 s · 37.5 MB103 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (37.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.3 s · 31.6 MB31 images could be 31.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.4 s41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.4 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 354 KiBAbout 354 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
800 ms · 211 KiB211 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 75 KiBAbout 75 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 166 KiB and 120 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 236 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 37.7 s
37.7 sYour largest element takes 37.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 40.5 s
40.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 40.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
24 images without width and height
24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 67 ms to 70 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors wait 0.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 70 ms
70 msReal visitors wait 70 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.5 s
0.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 194 ms
194 msReal visitors wait 194 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 25 ms
25 msScripts block the page for only 25 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 37.7 MB in 107 requests
37.7 MBYour homepage downloads 37.7 MB in 107 requests on a phone: images 36.7 MB (60), scripts 819 KiB (22) and stylesheets 119 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images over 500 KB
11 images weigh 31.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
2.4 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Homepage-Banner-2.jpg at 4,320 px wide, shown at 1,284 px. Resized copies would save about 2.4 MB.
20 images in older formats
20 images (32.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 10.7 g of CO₂ per visit
10.69 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.69 g of CO₂e: 1282.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
12 tap targets too small
12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
30 images without alt text
30 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (54 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 54 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebPage: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at jurlique.hk/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Invalid hreflang
Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.
117 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 117 pages on jurlique.hk and 14 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 72 characters
Your meta description is 72 characters: “Jurlique HK 香港官方網站,源自南澳的天然護膚品牌。精選皇牌花卉水、抗老精華、玫瑰護手霜等一系列人氣產品,為肌膚注入大自然的修護力量。”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Jurlique HK 香港 | 澳洲天然護膚品牌 | 花卉水 | 護手霜 | 水精華”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.jurlique.hk/.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jurlique.hk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.jurlique.hk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/cleansers-and-exfoliators, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/mists-and-essences, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/face-oils, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/serums, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/moisturisers and https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/masks and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages with very little text
https://www.jurlique.hk/face, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/cleansers-and-exfoliators, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/mists-and-essences, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/face-oils, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/serums and https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/moisturisers and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 pages slow to respond
https://www.jurlique.hk/stores, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/cleansers-and-exfoliators, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/face-oils, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/serums, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/moisturisers and https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/masks and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
17 small tap targets
17 of 55 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 19 words
The homepage has only about 19 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jurlique.hk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Edgenext Legend Dynasty Pte. Ltd.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on jurlique.hk, including 11 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.