Website review, no card needed

jurlique.hk logo

jurlique.hk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202641 issues · 87 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on jurlique.hk, 20 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
795 ms525 msMay 16Oct 31668 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026735 ms
May 23, 2026714 ms
May 30, 2026692 ms
Jun 6, 2026645 ms
Jun 13, 2026614 ms
Jun 20, 2026651 ms
Jun 27, 2026661 ms
Jul 4, 2026743 ms
Jul 11, 2026764 ms
Jul 18, 2026734 ms
Jul 25, 2026690 ms
Aug 1, 2026705 ms
Aug 8, 2026670 ms
Aug 15, 2026709 ms
Aug 22, 2026739 ms
Aug 29, 2026619 ms
Sep 5, 2026619 ms
Sep 12, 2026605 ms
Sep 19, 2026556 ms
Sep 26, 2026666 ms
Oct 3, 2026658 ms
Oct 10, 2026704 ms
Oct 17, 2026714 ms
Oct 24, 2026683 ms
Oct 31, 2026668 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
80 ms65 msMay 16Oct 3170 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202667 ms
May 23, 202673 ms
May 30, 202673 ms
Jun 6, 202677 ms
Jun 13, 202678 ms
Jun 20, 202677 ms
Jun 27, 202676 ms
Jul 4, 202670 ms
Jul 18, 202670 ms
Aug 1, 202672 ms
Aug 8, 202671 ms
Aug 15, 202672 ms
Aug 22, 202672 ms
Sep 5, 202670 ms
Sep 12, 202670 ms
Sep 19, 202670 ms
Sep 26, 202672 ms
Oct 17, 202673 ms
Oct 31, 202670 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jurlique.hk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jurlique.hk at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. jurlique.hk at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. jurlique.hk at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. jurlique.hk at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. jurlique.hk at 5.1 s5.1 s
  6. jurlique.hk at 6.1 s6.1 s
  7. jurlique.hk at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. jurlique.hk at 8.1 s8.1 s

Speed

6 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.8 s · 37.5 MB

    103 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (37.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 s · 31.6 MB

    31 images could be 31.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.4 s

    41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 354 KiB

    About 354 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    800 ms · 211 KiB

    211 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 75 KiB

    About 75 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 166 KiB and 120 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 236 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.7 s

    37.7 s

    Your largest element takes 37.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.5 s

    40.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 67 ms to 70 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors wait 0.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 70 ms

    70 ms

    Real visitors wait 70 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.5 s

    0.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Real visitors wait 194 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 25 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 37.7 MB in 107 requests

    37.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 37.7 MB in 107 requests on a phone: images 36.7 MB (60), scripts 819 KiB (22) and stylesheets 119 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images over 500 KB

    11 images weigh 31.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    2.4 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Homepage-Banner-2.jpg at 4,320 px wide, shown at 1,284 px. Resized copies would save about 2.4 MB.

  • 20 images in older formats

    20 images (32.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 10.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.69 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.69 g of CO₂e: 1282.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 6582
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 12 tap targets too small

    12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 30 images without alt text

    30 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (54 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 54 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 6776
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebPage: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at jurlique.hk/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • 117 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 117 pages on jurlique.hk and 14 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 72 characters

    Your meta description is 72 characters: “Jurlique HK 香港官方網站,源自南澳的天然護膚品牌。精選皇牌花卉水、抗老精華、玫瑰護手霜等一系列人氣產品,為肌膚注入大自然的修護力量。”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Jurlique HK 香港 | 澳洲天然護膚品牌 | 花卉水 | 護手霜 | 水精華”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jurlique.hk/.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jurlique.hk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jurlique.hk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/cleansers-and-exfoliators, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/mists-and-essences, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/face-oils, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/serums, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/moisturisers and https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/masks and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages with very little text

    https://www.jurlique.hk/face, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/cleansers-and-exfoliators, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/mists-and-essences, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/face-oils, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/serums and https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/moisturisers and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 pages slow to respond

    https://www.jurlique.hk/stores, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/cleansers-and-exfoliators, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/face-oils, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/serums, https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/moisturisers and https://www.jurlique.hk/product-types/masks and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 17 small tap targets

    17 of 55 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 19 words

    The homepage has only about 19 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jurlique.hk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Edgenext Legend Dynasty Pte. Ltd.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on jurlique.hk, including 11 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25