Website review, no card needed

kaleido.ai logo

kaleido.ai website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202638 issues · 81 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on kaleido.ai, 10 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.0 sMay 2Oct 172.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms94 msMay 2Oct 17104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026105 ms
May 9, 2026101 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 2026108 ms
May 30, 2026100 ms
Jun 6, 202699 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 2026105 ms
Jun 27, 2026115 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026114 ms
Aug 1, 2026112 ms
Aug 8, 2026114 ms
Aug 15, 2026110 ms
Aug 22, 2026106 ms
Aug 29, 2026106 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026101 ms
Sep 26, 202697 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kaleido.ai (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kaleido.ai at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kaleido.ai at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. kaleido.ai at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. kaleido.ai at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. kaleido.ai at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. kaleido.ai at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. kaleido.ai at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. kaleido.ai at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix71
  • Improve image delivery

    8.2 s · 1.7 MB

    1 image could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71 (desktop: 84). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    760 ms · 174 KiB

    About 174 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Google Fonts and others), adding 1.9 MB and 97 ms of main-thread time.

  • kaleidousercontent.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    kaleidousercontent.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    About 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 54 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 176 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 63 ms

    63 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 63 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Your largest element takes 12.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Kaleido AI GmbH is now Canva Austria GmbH. All products sta…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Real visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.8 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 4 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix33
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    circle_logo_gradient.png weighs 1.7 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    1.6 MB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example circle_logo_gradient.png at 1,900 px wide, shown at 92 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.

  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 20 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 20 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (10), scripts 303 KiB (5) and fonts 51 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (1.7 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 70.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8790
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 16 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 16 pages on kaleido.ai and 22 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 105 characters

    Your meta description is 105 characters: “If you are curious to know more about visual AI, discover our products remove.bg, Unscreen and Designify.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Automate Workflows with Visual AI”.

  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Visual AI Made Simple & Accessible”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kaleido.ai/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kaleido.ai/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (674 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 5 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/contact, https://www.kaleido.ai/privacy, https://www.kaleido.ai/cookies, https://www.kaleido.ai/imprint and https://www.kaleido.ai/tos are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/contact has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.kaleido.ai/privacy, https://www.kaleido.ai/cookies, https://www.kaleido.ai/imprint and https://www.kaleido.ai/tos use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/contact, https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/solutions and https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/success-stories have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    7 pages of 10 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 225 words

    The homepage has only about 225 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Try Canva” and “Get in touch”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kaleido.ai, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on kaleido.ai, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25