Website review, no card needed
kaleido.ai website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202638 issues · 81 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on kaleido.ai, 10 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.2 s · 1.7 MB1 image could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 71
71/100Your mobile performance score is 71 (desktop: 84). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
760 ms · 174 KiBAbout 174 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Google Fonts and others), adding 1.9 MB and 97 ms of main-thread time.
kaleidousercontent.com adds 0 ms
0 mskaleidousercontent.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 17 KiBAbout 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 54 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 176 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 63 ms
63 msYour server sent the HTML in 63 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.4 s
12.4 sYour largest element takes 12.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Kaleido AI GmbH is now Canva Austria GmbH. All products sta…”.
Time to Interactive: 12.4 s
12.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 31% slower for real visitors
+31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 104 ms
104 msReal visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 2.8 s
2.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.8 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 4 ms
4 msScripts block the page for only 4 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
circle_logo_gradient.png weighs 1.7 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
1.6 MB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example circle_logo_gradient.png at 1,900 px wide, shown at 92 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.
Page weight: 2.1 MB in 20 requests
2.1 MBYour homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 20 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (10), scripts 303 KiB (5) and fonts 51 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (1.7 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 70.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
16 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 16 pages on kaleido.ai and 22 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 105 characters
Your meta description is 105 characters: “If you are curious to know more about visual AI, discover our products remove.bg, Unscreen and Designify.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Automate Workflows with Visual AI”.
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Visual AI Made Simple & Accessible”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kaleido.ai/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.kaleido.ai/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (674 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/contact, https://www.kaleido.ai/privacy, https://www.kaleido.ai/cookies, https://www.kaleido.ai/imprint and https://www.kaleido.ai/tos are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/contact has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages share a meta description
https://www.kaleido.ai/privacy, https://www.kaleido.ai/cookies, https://www.kaleido.ai/imprint and https://www.kaleido.ai/tos use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/contact, https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/solutions and https://www.kaleido.ai/enterprise/success-stories have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
7 pages of 10 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 225 words
The homepage has only about 225 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Try Canva” and “Get in touch”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kaleido.ai, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on kaleido.ai, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.