Website review, no card needed
kangu.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202628 issues · 64 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on kangu.com.br, 10 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 176 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 151 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 72 KiBAbout 72 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (mlstatic.com, mercadolibre.com and meli.com), adding 265 KiB and 62 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 97
97/100Your mobile performance score is 97. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.3 s
A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 129 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 117 ms
117 msReal visitors wait 117 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 176 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 2.7 s
2.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.7 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sYour largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “CNPJ n.º 03.007.331/0001-41 / Av. das Nações Unidas, nº 3.0…”.
Time to Interactive: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe page is fully interactive after 2.0 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.08 g of CO₂ per visit
0.08 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.08 g of CO₂e: 10.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 300 KiB in 33 requests
300 KiBYour homepage downloads 300 KiB in 33 requests on a phone: scripts 136 KiB (16), stylesheets 63 KiB (2) and fonts 44 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “Ajuda Kangu”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
12 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 12 pages on kangu.com.br and 3 external pages.
2 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/38279.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 4 AI answer engine crawlers
4 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 2 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot and ClaudeBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/991 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/promocoes and https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/afiliados-home all use the title “Mercado Libre”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/acessibilidade/feedback, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/promocoes, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/privacidade, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/acessibilidade and https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/afiliados-home have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/23303, whose canonical is https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/informacoes-sobre-seguros_23303. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/991, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/promocoes, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/privacidade, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/23303 and https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/afiliados-home have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 pages with very little text
https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/acessibilidade/feedback, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/promocoes, https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/ajuda/23303 and https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/l/afiliados-home have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 130 words
The homepage has only about 130 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kangu.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on kangu.com.br, including 6 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.