Website review, no card needed
kanu.pet website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202638 issues · 85 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on kanu.pet, 12 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #50,560 of 99,499 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #32,102 of 54,551 online storesbeats 36%
- #30,614 of 49,515 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 188 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,973 HTML elements
The page has 3,973 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
1.5 MB49 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 792 KiBAbout 792 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
550 ms · 367 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (367 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
900 ms13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Shopify adds 440 ms
440 msShopify costs a phone 440 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 463 ms
463 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 463 ms of main-thread work and 637 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 302 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 59 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
12 KiBAbout 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 19.3 s
19.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.2 s
5.2 sYour largest element takes 5.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Kanu Pet”.
Real-user INP: 254 ms
254 msReal visitors wait 254 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 5.6 s
5.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 446 ms
446 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 446 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 742 ms
742 msReal visitors wait 742 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.039
0.039The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.039, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.2 MB in 319 requests
6.2 MBYour homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 319 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (99), scripts 1.9 MB (80) and other files 743 KiB (96). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
32 images far larger than shown
1.3 MB32 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1_5c846415-34a8-44a5-91d9-f565d510a7bc.webp at 600 px wide, shown at 181 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.
27 images in older formats
27 images (4.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
4ed76e7d-28b7-4672-a035-9b89282c0c73.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.76 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.76 g of CO₂e: 211.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
59 text elements with low contrast
59 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
52 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Table header text should not be empty (1 element)
Table header text should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 191 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
60 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 68 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 60 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“”, “” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
495 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 495 pages on kanu.pet and 13 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 121 characters
Your meta description is 121 characters: “Kanu Pet: Tu tienda de mascotas con alimento natural, juguetes y más para perros y gatos. Calidad y confianza desde 199…”.
Title: 36 characters
Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “Kanu Pet | Tienda de Mascotas Online”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://kanu.pet/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kanu.pet/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,965 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://kanu.pet/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-seco-natural-para-perros and https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-seco-tradicional-para-perros have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-seco-natural-para-perros, https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-seco-tradicional-para-perros, https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-medicado-para-perro, https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-humedo-para-perro, https://kanu.pet/collections/alimento-natural-y-congelado-para-perro and https://kanu.pet/collections/toppers-para-perros and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 176 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
233 of 248 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,324 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,324 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Klaviyo and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 6 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kanu.pet, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Ecomposer Builder · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Analyzely · Pixee Facebook Pixel · Forms · Wizybot · Hidepay · Upcart · Shortly Url Shortener Track
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on kanu.pet, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.