Website review, no card needed

kelediciones.com logo

kelediciones.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202655 issues · 96 checks

This review found 55 issues worth fixing on kelediciones.com, 18 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 36. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s3.5 sApr 25Oct 104.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.7 s
May 2, 20263.8 s
May 9, 20263.8 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
374 ms246 msApr 25Oct 10359 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026317 ms
May 2, 2026313 ms
May 9, 2026306 ms
May 16, 2026270 ms
May 23, 2026264 ms
May 30, 2026261 ms
Jun 6, 2026264 ms
Jun 13, 2026309 ms
Jun 20, 2026323 ms
Jun 27, 2026332 ms
Jul 4, 2026331 ms
Jul 11, 2026329 ms
Jul 18, 2026318 ms
Jul 25, 2026306 ms
Aug 1, 2026304 ms
Aug 8, 2026312 ms
Aug 15, 2026312 ms
Aug 22, 2026322 ms
Aug 29, 2026334 ms
Sep 5, 2026332 ms
Sep 12, 2026343 ms
Sep 19, 2026346 ms
Sep 26, 2026351 ms
Oct 3, 2026354 ms
Oct 10, 2026359 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kelediciones.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kelediciones.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. kelediciones.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. kelediciones.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. kelediciones.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. kelediciones.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. kelediciones.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  7. kelediciones.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. kelediciones.com at 7.6 s7.6 s

Speed

13 to fix36
  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.2 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 583 KiB

    18 images could be 583 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 857 ms

    857 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 857 ms of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • vtexassets.com adds 896 ms

    896 ms

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 896 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 514 KiB

    35 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (514 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 494 ms

    494 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 494 ms of main-thread work and 528 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • hsappstatic.net adds 474 ms

    474 ms

    hsappstatic.net costs a phone 474 ms of main-thread work and 710 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 428 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 350 ms.

  • Facebook adds 286 ms

    286 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 286 ms of main-thread work and 284 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 59 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 81 KiB

    About 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 63 but mobile only 36. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 561 ms

    561 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 561 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.9 s

    30.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 406 ms

    406 ms

    Real visitors wait 406 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 317 ms to 359 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.049

    0.049

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.049, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.6 MB in 177 requests

    5.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 177 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (71), images 990 KiB (50) and other files 721 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (527 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    116 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 263418-500-auto at 500 px wide, shown at 110 px. Resized copies would save about 116 KiB.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 190.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8286
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10078
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is short (45 characters)

    Your meta description is only 45 characters: “Kel Ediciones - Books in English for Everyone”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (ItemList and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 51 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on kelediciones.com and 12 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Comprar Libros en Inglés Online | Kel Ediciones Argentina”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.kelediciones.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kelediciones.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kelediciones.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (368 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 5 pages without a title

    https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/non-fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/kids, https://www.kelediciones.com/english-language-teaching and https://www.kelediciones.com/school-books have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 4 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.kelediciones.com/9269, https://www.kelediciones.com/9023, https://www.kelediciones.com/5593 and https://www.kelediciones.com/9024 are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/non-fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/kids, https://www.kelediciones.com/english-language-teaching and https://www.kelediciones.com/school-books have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://www.kelediciones.com/colegios, https://www.kelediciones.com/9269, https://www.kelediciones.com/9023, https://www.kelediciones.com/5593 and https://www.kelediciones.com/9024 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://www.kelediciones.com/colegios, https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/non-fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/kids, https://www.kelediciones.com/english-language-teaching and https://www.kelediciones.com/school-books and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.kelediciones.com/colegios and https://www.kelediciones.com/momsday have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/manias-benteveo---desafios, https://www.kelediciones.com/espanol, https://www.kelediciones.com/momsday, https://www.kelediciones.com/9269 and https://www.kelediciones.com/9023 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 209 words

    The homepage has only about 209 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Join us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 22 cookies set on arrival

    22

    Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kelediciones.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 55 issues on kelediciones.com, including 25 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25