Website review, no card needed
kelediciones.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202655 issues · 96 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on kelediciones.com, 18 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 36. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
57FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 317 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 313 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 306 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 270 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 264 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 343 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 351 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 359 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.9 s
2.8 s
3.8 s
4.7 s
5.7 s
6.6 s
7.6 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.1 s
A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.2 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 583 KiB18 images could be 583 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 857 ms
857 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 857 ms of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
vtexassets.com adds 896 ms
896 msvtexassets.com costs a phone 896 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 514 KiB35 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (514 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 494 ms
494 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 494 ms of main-thread work and 528 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
hsappstatic.net adds 474 ms
474 mshsappstatic.net costs a phone 474 ms of main-thread work and 710 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 428 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
350 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 350 ms.
Facebook adds 286 ms
286 msFacebook costs a phone 286 ms of main-thread work and 284 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 59 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 81 KiBAbout 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 63 but mobile only 36. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 561 ms
561 msYour server sent the HTML in 561 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 30.9 s
30.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s
6.6 sYour largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 8.6 s
8.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 406 ms
406 msReal visitors wait 406 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 317 ms to 359 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.049
0.049The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.049, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 177 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 177 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (71), images 990 KiB (50) and other files 721 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (527 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
4 images far larger than shown
116 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 263418-500-auto at 500 px wide, shown at 110 px. Resized copies would save about 116 KiB.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 190.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
11 links without text
11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is short (45 characters)
Your meta description is only 45 characters: “Kel Ediciones - Books in English for Everyone”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (ItemList and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
51 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 51 pages on kelediciones.com and 12 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Comprar Libros en Inglés Online | Kel Ediciones Argentina”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.kelediciones.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kelediciones.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.kelediciones.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (368 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a title
https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/non-fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/kids, https://www.kelediciones.com/english-language-teaching and https://www.kelediciones.com/school-books have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
4 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.kelediciones.com/9269, https://www.kelediciones.com/9023, https://www.kelediciones.com/5593 and https://www.kelediciones.com/9024 are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/non-fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/kids, https://www.kelediciones.com/english-language-teaching and https://www.kelediciones.com/school-books have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages share a meta description
https://www.kelediciones.com/colegios, https://www.kelediciones.com/9269, https://www.kelediciones.com/9023, https://www.kelediciones.com/5593 and https://www.kelediciones.com/9024 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.kelediciones.com/colegios, https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/non-fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/kids, https://www.kelediciones.com/english-language-teaching and https://www.kelediciones.com/school-books and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.kelediciones.com/colegios and https://www.kelediciones.com/momsday have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.kelediciones.com/fiction, https://www.kelediciones.com/manias-benteveo---desafios, https://www.kelediciones.com/espanol, https://www.kelediciones.com/momsday, https://www.kelediciones.com/9269 and https://www.kelediciones.com/9023 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 209 words
The homepage has only about 209 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Join us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kelediciones.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on kelediciones.com, including 25 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.