Website review, no card needed

kiabi.uy logo

kiabi.uy website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202640 issues · 83 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on kiabi.uy, 17 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
178 ms123 msMay 16Oct 31172 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026134 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026144 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026148 ms
Jul 11, 2026154 ms
Jul 18, 2026157 ms
Jul 25, 2026161 ms
Aug 1, 2026159 ms
Aug 8, 2026158 ms
Aug 15, 2026153 ms
Aug 22, 2026152 ms
Aug 29, 2026152 ms
Sep 5, 2026154 ms
Sep 12, 2026159 ms
Sep 19, 2026160 ms
Sep 26, 2026163 ms
Oct 3, 2026163 ms
Oct 10, 2026165 ms
Oct 17, 2026169 ms
Oct 24, 2026171 ms
Oct 31, 2026172 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kiabi.uy (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kiabi.uy at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. kiabi.uy at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. kiabi.uy at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. kiabi.uy at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. kiabi.uy at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. kiabi.uy at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. kiabi.uy at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. kiabi.uy at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

4 to fix61
  • Improve image delivery

    6.8 s · 7.3 MB

    24 images could be 7.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • 2,551 HTML elements

    The page has 2,551 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    104 KiB

    About 104 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, nfcube.com and Google Fonts and others), adding 214 KiB and 55 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 51 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 367 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 38.6 s

    38.6 s

    Your largest element takes 38.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 18.3 s

    18.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.9 s

    40.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 215 ms

    215 ms

    Real visitors wait 215 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 172 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 524 ms

    524 ms

    Real visitors wait 524 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.3 MB in 210 requests

    12.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 210 requests on a phone: images 11.1 MB (56), other files 725 KiB (72) and scripts 311 KiB (50). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 7.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 15 images far larger than shown

    5.3 MB

    15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example men.png at 3,359 px wide, shown at 246 px. Resized copies would save about 5.3 MB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (551 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.48 g of CO₂e: 417.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8389
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (41 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 41 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (9 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10071
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (73 characters)

    Your title is 73 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “KIABI - Moda francesa de mujer, hombre, niño, niña y bebé – Kiabi Uruguay”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (164 characters)

    Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 190 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 190 pages on kiabi.uy and 5 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kiabi.uy/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kiabi.uy/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,583 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://kiabi.uy/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://kiabi.uy/collections/all, https://kiabi.uy/pages/wishlist, https://kiabi.uy/pages/tiendas, https://kiabi.uy/collections/kiabi-home, https://kiabi.uy/collections/abrigos-cazadoras-y-plumiferos and https://kiabi.uy/collections/blazers have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://kiabi.uy/pages/wishlist has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 115 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://kiabi.uy/.

  • 65 small tap targets

    65 of 156 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 796 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 796 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kiabi.uy, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 4 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Gdpr Cookie Consent · nfcube.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
224 open roles
Teams
FR : Réseau Magasin (37), ES : TIENDAS (29), IT : Negozi (15), PT : Loja/Vendedor (3)
Job board
smartrecruiters

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on kiabi.uy, including 12 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25