Website review, no card needed

kingpower.com logo

kingpower.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202644 issues · 87 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on kingpower.com, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
266 ms194 msMay 16Oct 31245 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026203 ms
May 23, 2026203 ms
May 30, 2026203 ms
Jun 6, 2026204 ms
Jun 13, 2026203 ms
Jun 20, 2026202 ms
Jun 27, 2026207 ms
Jul 4, 2026207 ms
Jul 11, 2026211 ms
Jul 18, 2026216 ms
Jul 25, 2026216 ms
Aug 1, 2026219 ms
Aug 8, 2026221 ms
Aug 15, 2026223 ms
Aug 22, 2026228 ms
Aug 29, 2026230 ms
Sep 5, 2026233 ms
Sep 12, 2026230 ms
Sep 19, 2026228 ms
Sep 26, 2026231 ms
Oct 3, 2026241 ms
Oct 10, 2026254 ms
Oct 17, 2026258 ms
Oct 24, 2026256 ms
Oct 31, 2026245 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kingpower.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kingpower.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. kingpower.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. kingpower.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  4. kingpower.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  5. kingpower.com at 7.2 s7.2 s
  6. kingpower.com at 8.6 s8.6 s
  7. kingpower.com at 10.0 s10.0 s
  8. kingpower.com at 11.5 s11.5 s

Speed

8 to fix10
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.4 s · 3.3 MB

    39 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 710 KiB

    About 710 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.2 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 10

    10/100

    Your mobile performance score is 10. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 5,598 HTML elements

    The page has 5,598 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 1.5 MB

    13 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.5 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and cloudfront.net and others), adding 546 KiB and 343 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 58 KiB

    About 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 90 ms

    90 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 90 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    Your largest element takes 15.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “https://kpc-prod-contents.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/c…”.

  • Speed Index: 16.3 s

    16.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.0 s

    25.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.811

    0.811

    The layout shifts by 0.811 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 263 ms

    263 ms

    Real visitors wait 263 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 203 ms to 245 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix36
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 133 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 133 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (36), scripts 1.7 MB (48) and fonts 337 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    32x32_f3156af4b1.gif weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (2.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    New_arrivals_Top_Banner_on_Web_1280x720_EN_831e69f6e6.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    199 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example New_arrivals_Top_Banner_on_Web_1280x720_EN_831e69f6e6.png at 1,280 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 199 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (55 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.53 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.53 g of CO₂e: 184.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8289
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (268 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 268 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8380
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 7 links crawlers can't follow

    7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 50 internal links, 49 external

    The homepage links to 50 pages on kingpower.com and 49 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “KING POWER ONLINE | Discover a world of luxury — shop duty free for airport collection or home delivery products delive…”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “KING POWER ONLINE | Duty Free & Home Delivery Shopping”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kingpower.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    16%

    A phone browser shows 1,263 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 204. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kingpower.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.kingpower.com/en and / all use the title “KING POWER ONLINE | Duty Free & Home Delivery Shopping”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.kingpower.com/brand/chloe, https://www.kingpower.com/brand/shiseido and https://www.kingpower.com/brand/on have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    /, https://www.kingpower.com/content/click-and-collect, https://www.kingpower.com/content/home-delivery, https://www.kingpower.com/lancome/product/lancome-absolue-longevity-md-reset-the-serum-50-ml, https://www.kingpower.com/content/partner-ktc-bank-top-spender and https://www.kingpower.com/content/connect-kingpower-member and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.kingpower.com/content/click-and-collect, https://www.kingpower.com/content/home-delivery and https://www.kingpower.com/content/partner-ktc-bank-top-spender took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    111 of 120 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,263 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,263 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “log in / register” and “How to Shop Duty-Free Online”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kingpower.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Founded
1989
Headquarters
Bangkok

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on kingpower.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25