Website review, no card needed

kiwi.com logo

kiwi.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202637 issues · 56 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on kiwi.com, 7 of them high impact, across 56 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.8 sMay 16Oct 312.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Oct 31, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
398 ms346 msMay 16Oct 31379 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026352 ms
May 23, 2026352 ms
May 30, 2026355 ms
Jun 6, 2026357 ms
Jun 13, 2026360 ms
Jun 20, 2026364 ms
Jun 27, 2026369 ms
Jul 4, 2026376 ms
Jul 11, 2026380 ms
Jul 18, 2026380 ms
Jul 25, 2026377 ms
Aug 1, 2026377 ms
Aug 8, 2026380 ms
Aug 15, 2026385 ms
Aug 22, 2026389 ms
Aug 29, 2026391 ms
Sep 5, 2026392 ms
Sep 12, 2026392 ms
Sep 19, 2026392 ms
Sep 26, 2026392 ms
Oct 3, 2026389 ms
Oct 10, 2026387 ms
Oct 17, 2026386 ms
Oct 24, 2026385 ms
Oct 31, 2026379 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kiwi.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kiwi.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kiwi.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. kiwi.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. kiwi.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. kiwi.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. kiwi.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. kiwi.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. kiwi.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix85
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 85

    85/100

    Your mobile performance score is 85. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    755 ms

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 755 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    468 KiB

    About 468 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 378 ms

    378 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 378 ms of main-thread work and 424 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,827 HTML elements

    The page has 1,827 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Forter and iPerceptions and others), adding 682 KiB and 438 ms of main-thread time.

  • Document request latency

    200 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 200 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 189 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    81 KiB

    5 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    54 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (54 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 29 ms

    29 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.5 s

    18.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 414 ms

    414 ms

    Real visitors wait 414 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.20

    0.20

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 367 ms

    367 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 367 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 352 ms to 379 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “When you browse our website, Kiwi.com and our partners will…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix50
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 144 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 144 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (76), images 913 KiB (24) and HTML 230 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.94 g of CO₂e: 113.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fix97
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 10050
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Client Challenge”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.kiwi.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at kiwi.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

AI search readiness

1 to fix69
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kiwi.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7388
  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 console errors

    3 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“A required part of this site could not load. This may be due to a browser extension, network issues…”).

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix30
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 35 words

    The homepage has only about 35 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kiwi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Fastly

Company

Employees
877
Founded
2012
Headquarters
Prague

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on kiwi.com, including 17 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25