Website review, no card needed

kjellberg.de logo

kjellberg.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202638 issues · 79 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on kjellberg.de, 10 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms78 msMay 9Oct 2486 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202683 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202688 ms
May 30, 202685 ms
Jun 6, 202685 ms
Jun 13, 202681 ms
Jun 20, 202680 ms
Jun 27, 202685 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202689 ms
Jul 18, 202689 ms
Jul 25, 202685 ms
Aug 1, 202682 ms
Aug 8, 202680 ms
Aug 15, 202681 ms
Aug 22, 202684 ms
Aug 29, 202685 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 202690 ms
Sep 26, 202689 ms
Oct 3, 202690 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms
Oct 24, 202686 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kjellberg.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kjellberg.de at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kjellberg.de at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. kjellberg.de at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. kjellberg.de at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. kjellberg.de at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. kjellberg.de at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. kjellberg.de at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. kjellberg.de at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

6 to fix60
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 188 KiB

    15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (188 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 70). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 163 KiB

    About 163 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 53 KiB

    About 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    348 KiB

    9 images could be 348 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (etracker, Google Tag Manager and leadinfo.net and others), adding 254 KiB and 130 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 234 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 120 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 42% slower for real visitors

    +42%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 995 ms

    995 ms

    Real visitors wait 995 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.176

    0.176

    The layout shifts by 0.176 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 83 ms to 86 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 86 ms

    86 ms

    Real visitors wait 86 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • 14 images in older formats

    14 images (804 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (689 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.46 g of CO₂e: 55.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 64 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 64 requests on a phone: images 1,004 KiB (27), scripts 435 KiB (18) and fonts 132 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8292
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    4 dropdowns have no label.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 10 form fields without a label

    10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8373
  • Title is long (132 characters)

    Your title is 132 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Kjellberg Finsterwalde | Plasma Cutting Systems, Plasma Cutting Technology, Welding Elect…”.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (195 characters)

    Your meta description is 195 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 8 problems

    Structured data found (ImageObject, Page and WebPage) but with 8 problems, for example “ImageObject: contentUrl is not an absolute URL ("https://www.kjellberg.de/assets/images/4/logo-swgk071jdg7kqbp.png")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 164 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 164 pages on kjellberg.de and 26 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Kjellberg Finsterwalde: We know how.”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kjellberg.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kjellberg.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,051 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.kjellberg.de/home.html and https://www.kjellberg.de/kjellberg-finsterwalde-en.html all use the title “Kjellberg Finsterwalde | Plasma Cutting Systems, Plasma Cutting Techn…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.kjellberg.de/references.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 7 broken images

    7 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.kjellberg.de/#.

  • 17 small tap targets

    17 of 41 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 891 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 891 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Download”, “Contact” and “Start”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kjellberg.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Contao Open Source CMS
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on kjellberg.de, including 15 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25