Website review, no card needed
kkesh.med.sa website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202655 issues · 89 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on kkesh.med.sa, 29 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
56FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 620 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 621 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 508 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 232 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
31.9 s · 21.9 MB84 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (21.9 MB).
Improve image delivery
16.1 s · 16.7 MB32 images could be 16.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.2 s · 593 KiBAbout 593 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.
Document request latency
1.3 s · 755 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 1.3 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused CSS
1.3 s · 435 KiBAbout 435 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 13.2 s
A phone's processor spends 13.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce initial server response time
1.3 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.3 s on a phone.
Font display
1.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.0 s).
Mobile performance score: 5
5/100Your mobile performance score is 5. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Google Tag Manager and Twitter and others), adding 1.0 MB and 719 ms of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 513 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
450 ms · 11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Clarity adds 301 ms
301 msClarity costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 29 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 254 ms
254 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 178 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 1.4 s
1.4 sYour server takes 1.4 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
YouTube adds 8 ms
8 msYouTube costs a phone 8 ms of main-thread work and 411 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.7 s
5.7 sReal visitors wait 5.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 1.01
1.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s
8.1 sThe first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 69.3 s
69.3 sYour largest element takes 69.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “KKESH&RC Raises Awareness of Breast Cancer and the Importan…”.
Speed Index: 26.9 s
26.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 26.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 97.9 s
97.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 97.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.903
0.903The layout shifts by 0.903 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 266 ms
266 msReal visitors wait 266 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.9 s to 5.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 63% faster for real visitors
-63%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 620 ms to 232 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 23.8 MB in 156 requests
23.8 MBYour homepage downloads 23.8 MB in 156 requests on a phone: images 19.3 MB (53), scripts 2.6 MB (32) and HTML 1.2 MB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 5.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
4.3 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1c0a6427-f110-4da3-84fe-021ccde5b0eb.jpg at 7,979 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.3 MB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (4.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
1c0a6427-f110-4da3-84fe-021ccde5b0eb.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 6.8 g of CO₂ per visit
6.76 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.76 g of CO₂e: 810.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“القائمة الرئيسية” and “إحصائيات المستشفى لعام ٢٠٢٥”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (194 characters)
Your meta description is 194 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Only 4 internal links
The homepage links to only 4 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
9 links crawlers can't follow
9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
5 checks passed
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “مستشفى الملك خالد التخصصي للعيون”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://kkesh.med.sa/home?lang=ar.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kkesh.med.sa/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
8%A phone browser shows 253 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 19. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://kkesh.med.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
4 pages share a title
https://kkesh.med.sa/home, /, https://kkesh.med.sa/terms-of-use and https://kkesh.med.sa/privacy-policy all use the title “مستشفى الملك خالد التخصصي للعيون”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
/, https://kkesh.med.sa/terms-of-use and https://kkesh.med.sa/privacy-policy have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
/, https://kkesh.med.sa/terms-of-use and https://kkesh.med.sa/privacy-policy have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 internal pages checked
We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 35 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 253 words of copy
The homepage carries about 253 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kkesh.med.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Awalnet
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on kkesh.med.sa, including 28 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.