Website review, no card needed
klappen.se website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202629 issues · 79 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on klappen.se, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 875 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 916 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 966 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 985 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 944 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 927 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 929 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 923 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 923 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 939 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 967 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.9 s · 1.0 MB42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.8 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.
Improve image delivery
2.2 s · 569 KiB6 images could be 569 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 452 KiBAbout 452 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 91 KiBAbout 91 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 20 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 147 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cookietractor.com and Google Fonts and others), adding 293 KiB and 104 ms of main-thread time.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 90 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 378 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.0 s
12.0 sYour largest element takes 12.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Hela familjens skidäventyr Vinter Sommar & höst Boende Skip…”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s
7.0 sThe first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.0 s
12.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 59% slower for real visitors
+59%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 333 ms
333 msReal visitors wait 333 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 161 ms
161 msScripts block the page for only 161 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 52 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 52 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (31), scripts 822 KiB (8) and fonts 146 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.90 g of CO₂e: 108.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
12 form fields without a label
12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (2 elements).
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 85 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
28 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 28 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (7 characters)
Your title is only 7 characters: “Kläppen”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.klappen.se/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
312 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 312 pages on klappen.se and 6 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Hela familjens skidäventyr”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.klappen.se/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.klappen.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,395 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://www.klappen.se/en all use the title “Kläppen”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.klappen.se/att-gora, https://www.klappen.se/hyra-butik and https://www.klappen.se/en have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.klappen.se/skipass and https://www.klappen.se/skidakning/skipass use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.klappen.se/skipass, whose canonical is https://www.klappen.se/skidakning/skipass. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 658 words of copy
The homepage carries about 658 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at klappen.se, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 29 issues on klappen.se, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.