Website review, no card needed
ksbe.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202642 issues · 86 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on ksbe.edu, 12 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 84 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 84 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 84 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 95 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.8 s · 1.4 MB31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.3 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 370 KiBAbout 370 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 379 KiBAbout 379 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
750 ms · 511 KiB7 images could be 511 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Evergage and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.0 MB and 527 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 388 ms
388 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 684 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 151 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 506 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 125 ms
125 msYour server sent the HTML in 125 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s
11.5 sYour largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ola Pauahi, Ola Hawai‘i LEARN THE LEGACY”.
Time to Interactive: 12.6 s
12.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 66% slower for real visitors
+66%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 847 ms
847 msReal visitors wait 847 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 3.8 s
3.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
16 images without width and height
16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.116
0.116The layout shifts by 0.116 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 202 ms
202 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 202 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 84 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 79 ms
79 msReal visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.7 MB in 80 requests
2.7 MBYour homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 80 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (25), scripts 989 KiB (17) and stylesheets 420 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (216 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (216 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.76 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.76 g of CO₂e: 90.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
28 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 28 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “Kamehameha Schools”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (265 characters)
Your meta description is 265 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at ksbe.edu/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
11 links crawlers can't follow
11 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
205 internal links, 45 external
The homepage links to 205 pages on ksbe.edu and 45 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Hānai i ke keiki, ola ka lāhui”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ksbe.edu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: EducationalOrganization.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ksbe.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ksbe.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,435 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.ksbe.edu/hawaii/summer is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.ksbe.edu/hawaii/summer has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages share a meta description
https://www.ksbe.edu/malama-ola, https://www.ksbe.edu/student-safety-and-well-being, https://www.ksbe.edu/education/hawaii, https://www.ksbe.edu/education/hawaii/elementary-school, https://www.ksbe.edu/education/hawaii/middle-school and https://www.ksbe.edu/education/hawaii/high-school and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.ksbe.edu/digital/canvas, whose canonical is https://www.ksbe.edu/canvas. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
9 pages without an H1
https://www.ksbe.edu/student-safety-and-well-being, https://www.ksbe.edu/education/hawaii, https://www.ksbe.edu/hawaii/summer, https://www.ksbe.edu/education/hawaii/contact-us, https://www.ksbe.edu/digital/canvas and https://www.ksbe.edu/education/kapalama and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.ksbe.edu/student-safety-and-well-being, https://www.ksbe.edu/digital/canvas, https://www.ksbe.edu/education/kapalama/halau-kukalaulama and https://www.ksbe.edu/education/kapalama/residential-life took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 100 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
35 small tap targets
35 of 56 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 796 words of copy
The homepage carries about 796 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact KS Hawai‘i”, “Contact KS Kapālama” and “Contact KS Maui”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ksbe.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Imperva
Company
- Founded
- 1887
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on ksbe.edu, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.