Website review, no card needed
ksc.de website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202647 issues · 88 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on ksc.de, 20 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 99 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 112 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,739 HTML elements
The page has 3,739 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 355 KiB15 images could be 355 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
600 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 492 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
183 KiBAbout 183 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, digiaccess.org and Google Tag Manager), adding 170 KiB and 132 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
35 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sYour largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 11.2 s
11.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.8 s
7.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.16
0.16For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.225
0.225The layout shifts by 0.225 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 514 ms
514 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 514 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
41 images without width and height
41 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 121 ms
121 msReal visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 662 ms
662 msReal visitors wait 662 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.2 MB in 91 requests
2.2 MBYour homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (53), scripts 442 KiB (17) and fonts 122 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
25 images in older formats
25 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (485 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.63 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.63 g of CO₂e: 75.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Required ARIA attributes must be provided (1 element)
Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
Positive tabindex
2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “Karlsruher SC”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (65 characters)
Your meta description is only 65 characters: “Offizielle Website des Karlsruher Sport-Club Mühlburg-Phönix e.V.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.ksc.de/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
188 internal links, 89 external
The homepage links to 188 pages on ksc.de and 89 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Jetzt den KSC-Newsletter abonnieren!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ksc.de/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ksc.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (911 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
https://www.ksc.de/tickets, https://www.ksc.de/archiv/newsletter/anmeldung-newsletter, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ksc-kompakt, https://www.ksc.de/matchcenter, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ticker and https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/news and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
11 pages without an H1
https://www.ksc.de/tickets, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ksc-kompakt, https://www.ksc.de/not-in-menue/business/business-uebersicht, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ticker, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/news and https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/blog-trainingslager-in-neukirchen and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.ksc.de/tickets has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.ksc.de/tickets, https://www.ksc.de/fanshop and https://www.ksc.de/matchcenter took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 157 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.ksc.de/.
11 small tap targets
11 of 53 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 641 words of copy
The homepage carries about 641 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ksc.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- TYPO3 CMS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1894
- Headquarters
- Karlsruhe
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on ksc.de, including 15 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.