Website review, no card needed

ksc.de logo

ksc.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202647 issues · 88 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on ksc.de, 20 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
117 ms93 msMay 2Oct 17112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026110 ms
May 9, 2026110 ms
May 16, 2026106 ms
May 23, 202699 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202696 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026105 ms
Jul 11, 2026105 ms
Jul 18, 2026105 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026109 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026112 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026114 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ksc.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ksc.de at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. ksc.de at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. ksc.de at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. ksc.de at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. ksc.de at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. ksc.de at 3.9 s3.9 s
  7. ksc.de at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. ksc.de at 5.2 s5.2 s

Speed

7 to fix44
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,739 HTML elements

    The page has 3,739 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 355 KiB

    15 images could be 355 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    600 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 492 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    183 KiB

    About 183 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, digiaccess.org and Google Tag Manager), adding 170 KiB and 132 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    35 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Your largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.2 s

    11.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.225

    0.225

    The layout shifts by 0.225 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 514 ms

    514 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 514 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 41 images without width and height

    41 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 662 ms

    662 ms

    Real visitors wait 662 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 91 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (53), scripts 442 KiB (17) and fonts 122 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 25 images in older formats

    25 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (485 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.63 g of CO₂e: 75.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7281
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Required ARIA attributes must be provided (1 element)

    Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Positive tabindex

    2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9275
  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Karlsruher SC”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (65 characters)

    Your meta description is only 65 characters: “Offizielle Website des Karlsruher Sport-Club Mühlburg-Phönix e.V.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.ksc.de/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 188 internal links, 89 external

    The homepage links to 188 pages on ksc.de and 89 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Jetzt den KSC-Newsletter abonnieren!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ksc.de/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ksc.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (911 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://www.ksc.de/tickets, https://www.ksc.de/archiv/newsletter/anmeldung-newsletter, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ksc-kompakt, https://www.ksc.de/matchcenter, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ticker and https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/news and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://www.ksc.de/tickets, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ksc-kompakt, https://www.ksc.de/not-in-menue/business/business-uebersicht, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/ticker, https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/news and https://www.ksc.de/profis/saison/blog-trainingslager-in-neukirchen and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.ksc.de/tickets has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.ksc.de/tickets, https://www.ksc.de/fanshop and https://www.ksc.de/matchcenter took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 157 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 10071
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.ksc.de/.

  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 53 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 641 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 641 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ksc.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
TYPO3 CMS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1894
Headquarters
Karlsruhe

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on ksc.de, including 15 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25