Website review, no card needed
kundalinibaby.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202643 issues · 80 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on kundalinibaby.com, 14 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
20.7 s · 8.0 MB11 images could be 8.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 20.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.8 s · 360 KiBAbout 360 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 146 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (146 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Wistia, Google Tag Manager and kajabi-cdn.com and others), adding 10.8 MB and 852 ms of main-thread time.
kajabi-cdn.com adds 154 ms
154 mskajabi-cdn.com costs a phone 154 ms of main-thread work and 10.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
550 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.
Minify JavaScript
460 ms · 72 KiB72 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
310 ms · 16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 185 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 958 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.3 s
33.3 sYour largest element takes 33.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Blending Mind & Body In Pregnancy & Birth Losing The Consta…”.
Time to Interactive: 33.3 s
33.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.2 s
8.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sThe first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 474 ms
474 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 474 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.0 MB in 74 requests
11.0 MBYour homepage downloads 11.0 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 9.9 MB (15), scripts 905 KiB (36) and fonts 218 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 6.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images in older formats
9 images (7.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (4.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
5 images far larger than shown
485 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example a36c88-6222-81d8-4125-f508077b6cb_3.png at 800 px wide, shown at 250 px. Resized copies would save about 485 KiB.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.13 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.13 g of CO₂e: 375.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
12 images without alt text
12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Blending Mind & Body In Pregnancy & Birth”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
17 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 17 pages on kundalinibaby.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 118 characters
Your meta description is 118 characters: “Empower your pregnancy in Mind, Body, Spirit and with Baby. Have a healthier, less anxious pregnancy and easier birth.”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Healthy Pregnancy ~ Easy Birth ~ Nourishing Postpartum”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.soulsangat.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.soulsangat.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (459 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.soulsangat.com/llms.txt (15 KiB, 64 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.soulsangat.com/resource_redirect/landing_pages/2150606450 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.soulsangat.com/about-katherine and https://www.soulsangat.com/resource_redirect/landing_pages/1534524 all use the title “About Katherine”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.soulsangat.com/work-with-me, https://www.soulsangat.com/about-katherine, https://www.soulsangat.com/blog, https://www.soulsangat.com/resource_redirect/landing_pages/1534524, https://www.soulsangat.com/contact and https://www.soulsangat.com/pages/privacy-policy and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.soulsangat.com/resource_redirect/landing_pages/1028270, whose canonical is https://www.soulsangat.com/freebie. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.soulsangat.com/resource_redirect/landing_pages/1028270 has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.soulsangat.com/resource_redirect/landing_pages/1028270 and https://www.soulsangat.com/contact have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 430 words of copy
The homepage carries about 430 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Free PDF Download”, “JOIN FREE COMMUNITY” and “Join the Facebook Group”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kundalinibaby.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar | Segment
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on kundalinibaby.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.