Website review, no card needed

kunduz.com logo

kunduz.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202646 issues · 82 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on kunduz.com, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 313.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
431 ms278 msMay 16Oct 31364 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026306 ms
May 23, 2026304 ms
May 30, 2026300 ms
Jun 6, 2026296 ms
Jun 13, 2026297 ms
Jun 20, 2026301 ms
Jun 27, 2026309 ms
Jul 4, 2026328 ms
Jul 11, 2026336 ms
Jul 18, 2026349 ms
Jul 25, 2026358 ms
Aug 1, 2026365 ms
Aug 8, 2026383 ms
Aug 15, 2026395 ms
Aug 22, 2026406 ms
Aug 29, 2026413 ms
Sep 5, 2026411 ms
Sep 12, 2026409 ms
Sep 19, 2026404 ms
Sep 26, 2026396 ms
Oct 3, 2026386 ms
Oct 10, 2026378 ms
Oct 17, 2026370 ms
Oct 24, 2026365 ms
Oct 31, 2026364 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kunduz.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kunduz.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. kunduz.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. kunduz.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. kunduz.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. kunduz.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. kunduz.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  7. kunduz.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  8. kunduz.com at 5.9 s5.9 s

Speed

12 to fix41
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 4.8 MB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 4.1 MB

    8 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 1,007 KiB

    About 1,007 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 757 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 512 ms

    512 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 512 ms of main-thread work and 578 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,111 HTML elements

    The page has 2,111 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • popupsmart.com adds 22 ms

    22 ms

    popupsmart.com costs a phone 22 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.8 s

    28.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Your largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Kunduz”.

  • Speed Index: 11.4 s

    11.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 318 ms

    318 ms

    Real visitors wait 318 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 306 ms to 364 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 8.5 MB in 165 requests

    8.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 165 requests on a phone: images 4.9 MB (20), scripts 2.4 MB (63) and fonts 643 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    234 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example can_you_explain_this_32.webp at 2,000 px wide, shown at 343 px. Resized copies would save about 234 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (67 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.42 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.42 g of CO₂e: 290.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7387
  • 18 buttons without a name

    18 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (70 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 70 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10075
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://kunduz.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 51 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on kunduz.com and 9 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 71 characters

    Your meta description is 71 characters: “A 24/7 homework app for students to get expert help in math and science”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Expert Q&A Homework Help - Kunduz”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,140 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://kunduz.com/llms.txt (9 KiB, 26 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    https://kunduz.com/tr has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,160 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,160 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get in Touch” and “Try Kunduz now”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Try Kunduz now” and “Get in Touch”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 100 testimonial or review blocks and “300K+ Students”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kunduz.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on kunduz.com, including 24 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25