Website review, no card needed

kurosbio.com logo

kurosbio.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202632 issues · 84 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on kurosbio.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s907 msMay 2Oct 172.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.2 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms81 msMay 2Oct 1791 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202691 ms
May 9, 202691 ms
May 16, 202693 ms
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202691 ms
Jun 6, 202689 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202686 ms
Jul 11, 202690 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 2026111 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026111 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026109 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026112 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202685 ms
Oct 17, 202691 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kurosbio.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kurosbio.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kurosbio.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. kurosbio.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. kurosbio.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. kurosbio.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. kurosbio.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. kurosbio.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. kurosbio.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    2.4 s · 459 KiB

    1 image could be 459 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 74). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    600 ms · 36 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Civic and b-cdn.net and others), adding 4.4 MB and 133 ms of main-thread time.

  • b-cdn.net adds 11 ms

    11 ms

    b-cdn.net costs a phone 11 ms of main-thread work and 3.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Document request latency

    262 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13 KiB).

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 66 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 153 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 402 ms

    402 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 402 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    Your largest element takes 14.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.9 s

    14.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 101% slower for real visitors

    +101%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Real visitors wait 84 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 557 ms

    557 ms

    Real visitors wait 557 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 16 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 4.8 MB in 49 requests

    4.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 49 requests on a phone: media 2.1 MB (1), images 1.8 MB (27) and HTML 394 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (376 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    2 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Kuros-world-map_website-feb-19-1024x654.png at 1,024 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 2 KiB.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.36 g of CO₂e: 162.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7486
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 65 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 65 pages on kurosbio.com and 5 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Kuros Biosciences pioneer biologic bone graft technologies, combining innovation with strong clinical evidence, to adva…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Grow bone with MagnetOsTM”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Kuros Biosciences – Grow Bone with MagnetOs Bone Graft”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kurosbio.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kurosbio.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://kurosbio.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,117 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content Security Policy directive 'upgrade-insecure-requests' is ignored when delivered in a report-only policy.”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,156 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,156 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Request Global Research Summary”, “Contact” and “Get in touch”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kurosbio.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on kurosbio.com, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25