Website review, no card needed
kwork.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202634 issues · 97 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on kwork.com, 13 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 299 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 306 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 298 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
kwork.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.6 s · 537 KiBAbout 537 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 65
65/100Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 129 KiB8 images could be 129 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 57 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (57 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 74 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (webvisor.org and Yandex Metrica), adding 73 KiB and 52 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
29 KiBAbout 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 459 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.7 s
5.7 sReal visitors wait 5.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s
11.1 sYour largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “SEO & Web Traffic”.
Time to Interactive: 11.1 s
11.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 246 ms
246 msReal visitors wait 246 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 299 ms to 298 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.065
0.065The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.065, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 44 ms
44 msScripts block the page for only 44 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.47 g of CO₂e: 56.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.7 MB in 107 requests
1.7 MBYour homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 107 requests on a phone: scripts 926 KiB (33), fonts 334 KiB (3) and images 278 KiB (36). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
23 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 29 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Shop freelance services with confidence on Kwork. Offers start at $10.”.
Meta description is long (201 characters)
Your meta description is 201 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
11 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 11 pages on kwork.com and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://kwork.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kwork.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
7 pages without an H1
/categories/design, /categories/programming, /categories/writing-translations, /categories/seo, /categories/marketing and /categories/audio-video and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
7 pages with very little text
/categories/design, /categories/programming, /categories/writing-translations, /categories/seo, /categories/marketing and /categories/audio-video and 1 other have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (kwork.com).
Valid certificate (99 days left)
The certificate from GlobalSign nv-sa · GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2025 verifies for kwork.com and is valid for another 99 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://kwork.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 10 links work
All 10 links checked from your homepage (10 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 6 days
kwork.com is registered until Nov 2026. If it lapses, the site and its email stop working and someone else can buy the name. Renew it, and turn on auto-renew.
No CAA record
kwork.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
kwork.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 16 years old
16 yearskwork.com was registered in Nov 2009 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 116 words
The homepage has only about 116 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Sign Up”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx ip4:93.171.201.31 ip4:93.171.201.68 ip4:93.171.200.48 ip4:93.171.201.102 ip4:93.171.201.10 ip4:93.171.201.4…”.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Iqweb
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on kwork.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.