laam.com website review

About 831 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

32 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, octane.store and Facebook and others), adding 2.6 MB and 870 ms of main-thread time.

10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (219 KiB).

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 338 ms of main-thread work and 509 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

octane.store costs a phone 218 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 351 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

The page has 2,406 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 250 ms.

Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

About 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Your largest element takes 15.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Basic Pret”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 22.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

Real visitors wait 383 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 328 ms to 369 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 421 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (80), scripts 2.1 MB (145) and other files 563 KiB (175). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.42 g of CO₂e: 170.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Headings should not be empty: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

The homepage links to 49 pages on laam.com and 1 external page.

https://laam.com/wishlist declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

/ and https://laam.com/wishlist all use the title “LAAM | South Asia's Largest Fashion Discovery Platform”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

https://laam.com/new-in, https://laam.com/brands, https://laam.com/orders and https://laam.com/help-center use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

https://laam.com/brands and https://laam.com/orders have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

https://laam.com/orders, https://laam.com/wishlist and https://laam.com/help-center have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

The homepage has only about 104 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Pinterest Tag and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.