Website review, no card needed

labs.google logo

labs.google website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202629 issues · 77 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on labs.google, 12 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.8 s3.9 sApr 18Oct 34.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20265.7 s
Apr 25, 20265.8 s
May 2, 20265.8 s
May 9, 20265.9 s
May 16, 20265.9 s
May 23, 20265.9 s
May 30, 20266.0 s
Jun 6, 20266.0 s
Jun 13, 20266.0 s
Jun 20, 20266.0 s
Jun 27, 20266.0 s
Jul 4, 20266.0 s
Jul 11, 20266.0 s
Jul 18, 20266.0 s
Jul 25, 20266.1 s
Aug 1, 20266.1 s
Aug 8, 20266.2 s
Aug 15, 20266.2 s
Aug 22, 20266.3 s
Aug 29, 20266.4 s
Sep 5, 20266.4 s
Sep 12, 20266.3 s
Sep 19, 20266.2 s
Sep 26, 20265.7 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
584 ms429 msApr 18Oct 3447 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026460 ms
Apr 25, 2026464 ms
May 2, 2026465 ms
May 9, 2026465 ms
May 16, 2026465 ms
May 23, 2026478 ms
May 30, 2026492 ms
Jun 6, 2026504 ms
Jun 13, 2026522 ms
Jun 20, 2026531 ms
Jun 27, 2026543 ms
Jul 4, 2026553 ms
Jul 11, 2026566 ms
Jul 18, 2026563 ms
Jul 25, 2026551 ms
Aug 1, 2026536 ms
Aug 8, 2026517 ms
Aug 15, 2026507 ms
Aug 22, 2026505 ms
Aug 29, 2026508 ms
Sep 5, 2026511 ms
Sep 12, 2026512 ms
Sep 19, 2026511 ms
Sep 26, 2026500 ms
Oct 3, 2026447 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of labs.google (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. labs.google at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. labs.google at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. labs.google at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. labs.google at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. labs.google at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. labs.google at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. labs.google at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. labs.google at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

7 to fix57
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.8 s · 96.0 MB

    49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (96.0 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 944 KiB

    13 images could be 944 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 393 KiB

    About 393 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 83). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 312 ms

    312 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 862 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Google Fonts and others), adding 489 KiB and 325 ms of main-thread time.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 199 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 83 but mobile only 57. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.4 s

    11.4 s

    Your largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Google Flow Music”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 500 ms

    500 ms

    Real visitors wait 500 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 460 ms to 447 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 749 ms

    749 ms

    Real visitors wait 749 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.7 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 198 ms

    198 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 198 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 105.2 MB in 62 requests

    105.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 105.2 MB in 62 requests on a phone: media 102.6 MB (24), images 1.5 MB (23) and scripts 932 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    360 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example playground-featured-hero-mobile.webp at 1,280 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 360 KiB.

  • About 29.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    29.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 29.83 g of CO₂e: 3579.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9394
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (5 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 13 internal links, 31 external

    The homepage links to 13 pages on labs.google and 31 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Stay up to date with the latest Google AI experiments, innovative tools, and technology. Explore the future of AI respo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Be the first to experiment”.

  • Title: 45 characters

    Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Google Labs: Google's home for AI experiments”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://labs.google/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://labs.google/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://labs.google/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (748 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://labs.google/playwithputty and https://labs.google/fx/tools/flow have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://labs.google/fx/tools/flow has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 8 internal pages checked

    We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 495 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 495 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try it now” and “Try It Now”.

  • 25 calls to action

    The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Try it now”, “Try It Now” and “Learn More”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at labs.google, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Google Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on labs.google, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25