Website review, no card needed
laclusaz.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202628 issues · 87 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on laclusaz.com, 10 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 21.0 MB in 171 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 127 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.3 s
2.0 s
2.6 s
3.3 s
4.0 s
4.6 s
5.3 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.8 s
A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 4.3 MB25 images could be 4.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, YouTube and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google CDN adds 897 ms
897 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 897 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
YouTube adds 569 ms
569 msYouTube costs a phone 569 ms of main-thread work and 972 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 554 ms
554 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 554 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 212 KiBAbout 212 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 302 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,782 HTML elements
The page has 1,782 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
200 ms11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 200 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
124 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (124 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
25 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 163 ms
163 msYour server sent the HTML in 163 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 34.8 s
34.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.3 s
6.3 sYour largest element takes 6.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.5 s
5.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 127 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 123 ms
123 msReal visitors wait 123 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 474 ms
474 msReal visitors wait 474 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 21.0 MB in 171 requests
21.0 MBYour homepage downloads 21.0 MB in 171 requests on a phone: images 15.8 MB (73), scripts 3.1 MB (50) and fonts 1.1 MB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
La-Clusaz-Hiver-19-20-BD©C.HUDRY-5-scaled.jpg weighs 534 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image in older formats
1 image (93 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (32 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 6.0 g of CO₂ per visit
5.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.96 g of CO₂e: 715.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 form fields without a label
12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
83 internal links, 30 external
The homepage links to 83 pages on laclusaz.com and 30 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Bienvenue dans un village de montagne authentique et dynamique. Au cœur de la Haute-Savoie, La Clusaz allie ride-cultur…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Bienvenue à La Clusaz”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “La Clusaz | Votre destination au cœur des Alpes”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.laclusaz.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.laclusaz.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.laclusaz.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (677 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.laclusaz.com/la-station, https://www.laclusaz.com/ski, https://www.laclusaz.com/le-mag, https://www.laclusaz.com/le-mag/inspirations/votre-journee-parfaite-au-yoga-festival-2, https://www.laclusaz.com/le-mag/no-story-no-future/botanico-et-les-racines-du-coeur and https://www.laclusaz.com/le-mag/inspirations/vacancessportives-4-astuces-pour-bien-tricher have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.laclusaz.com/reservation/hebergements has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.laclusaz.com/reservation/hebergements and https://www.laclusaz.com/nl took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
36 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 932 words of copy
The homepage carries about 932 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks and 6 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
27 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at laclusaz.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on laclusaz.com, including 16 speed issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.