Website review, no card needed
landsec.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202625 issues · 74 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on landsec.com, 5 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 118 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
422 KiBAbout 422 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 300 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 41 KiBAbout 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon and Google Tag Manager), adding 16 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 94
94/100Your mobile performance score is 94. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 369 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 92 ms
92 msYour server sent the HTML in 92 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 5.9 s
5.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 258 ms
258 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 258 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 125 ms
125 msReal visitors wait 125 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 3.0 s
3.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sYour largest element renders in 1.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Ouups, something went wrong!”.
Images and page weight
About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit
0.20 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.20 g of CO₂e: 23.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 721 KiB in 29 requests
721 KiBYour homepage downloads 721 KiB in 29 requests on a phone: scripts 603 KiB (14), stylesheets 70 KiB (6) and fonts 26 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
19 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 22 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 19 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “Not Found”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (9 characters)
Your meta description is only 9 characters: “Not Found”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.landsec.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
6 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 6 pages on landsec.com and 3 external pages.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.landsec.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
6 pages share a title
https://www.landsec.com/en, https://www.landsec.com/en/media-insights/press-releases/landsec-acquires-100-stake-in-metrocentre-gateshead, https://www.landsec.com/en/talent/working-at-landsec, https://www.landsec.com/en/investors/investors-overview, https://www.landsec.com/en/about/about-landsec/our-properties and https://www.landsec.com/en/media-insights/media-centre all use the title “Not Found”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages share a meta description
https://www.landsec.com/en/media-insights/press-releases/landsec-acquires-100-stake-in-metrocentre-gateshead, https://www.landsec.com/en/talent/working-at-landsec, https://www.landsec.com/en/investors/investors-overview, https://www.landsec.com/en/about/about-landsec/our-properties and https://www.landsec.com/en/media-insights/media-centre use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page with very little text
https://www.landsec.com/en/about/about-landsec/our-properties has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.landsec.com/en/media-insights/press-releases/landsec-acquires-100-stake-in-metrocentre-gateshead, https://www.landsec.com/en/talent/working-at-landsec, https://www.landsec.com/en/investors/investors-overview and https://www.landsec.com/en/about/about-landsec/our-properties took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
5 internal pages checked
We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 5 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 5 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 broken images
7 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://content.landsec.com/media/yayesrvy/wmagpiebanner.webp.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: An error occurred in the Server Components render. The specific message is omitted in production builds to avoid…”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Only about 4 words
The homepage has only about 4 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Learn more”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at landsec.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on landsec.com, including 7 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.