Website review, no card needed
lanolips.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202630 issues · 79 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on lanolips.pl, 10 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #60,979 of 99,499 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #37,938 of 54,551 online storesbeats 26%
- #35,892 of 49,515 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
4.3 s
8.7 s
13.0 s
17.4 s
21.7 s
26.1 s
30.4 s
34.8 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.9 s · 1.0 MB13 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 5.3 s
A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,614 HTML elements
The page has 3,614 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Shopify and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
800 ms · 318 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (318 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 379 KiBAbout 379 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 288 ms
288 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 288 ms of main-thread work and 511 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 163 ms
163 msShopify costs a phone 163 ms of main-thread work and 826 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 4 KiB4 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.7 s
13.7 sYour largest element takes 13.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Videos of models smiling and wearing Lanolips Ceramide Milk…”.
Speed Index: 17.4 s
17.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 24.5 s
24.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
3 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 180 ms
180 msScripts block the page for only 180 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.012
0.012The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.012, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 32.6 MB in 516 requests
32.6 MBYour homepage downloads 32.6 MB in 516 requests on a phone: media 25.6 MB (2), images 3.3 MB (64) and scripts 1.7 MB (111). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
364 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example lanolips-101-ointment-raspberry-shortcake-3g.png at 2,813 px wide, shown at 56 px. Resized copies would save about 364 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (56 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 9.2 g of CO₂ per visit
9.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.23 g of CO₂e: 1107.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 52 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
55 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 55 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Canonical points to another host
Your canonical URL points to lanolips.eu, not lanolips.pl, so Google may credit that host instead.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
154 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 154 pages on lanolips.pl and 15 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Looking for the world's best lip balm? All our products at Lanolips are made with a deeply moisturising, natural lanoli…”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “World's Best Lip Balm with Lanolin | Lanolips Europe”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lanolips.pl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and Applebot-Extended, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,145 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://lanolips.pl/llms.txt (16 KiB, 64 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://lanolips.pl/collections/daily-essentials and https://lanolips.pl/collections/best-sellers all use the title “Best Sellers”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://lanolips.pl/collections/best-sellers has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
https://lanolips.pl/collections/colour-collection took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 58 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,063 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,063 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now - 101 Ointment Strawberry” and “Shop Now - 101 Delicious”.
27 calls to action
The homepage has 27 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “Shop Lip Products” and “Shop Lip Collections”.
21 short forms
21 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
37 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lanolips.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Consentik Cookie · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Selecty · Microsoft Clarity · Yotpo Product Reviews · Consentik Ex · Freegifts · Bestpush · weglot.com · nice-team.net · bogos.io · pushowl.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on lanolips.pl, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.