Website review, no card needed

lanolips.com logo

lanolips.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202632 issues · 87 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on lanolips.com, 12 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 32.6 MB in 445 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.1 sMay 23Nov 71.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Nov 7, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
158 ms125 msMay 23Nov 7145 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026133 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026144 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026153 ms
Jul 25, 2026154 ms
Aug 1, 2026153 ms
Aug 8, 2026152 ms
Aug 15, 2026152 ms
Aug 22, 2026150 ms
Aug 29, 2026146 ms
Sep 5, 2026144 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026143 ms
Oct 10, 2026146 ms
Oct 17, 2026145 ms
Oct 24, 2026153 ms
Oct 31, 2026146 ms
Nov 7, 2026145 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lanolips.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lanolips.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. lanolips.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. lanolips.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. lanolips.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. lanolips.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  6. lanolips.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  7. lanolips.com at 8.7 s8.7 s
  8. lanolips.com at 9.9 s9.9 s

Speed

10 to fix51
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 526 KiB

    About 526 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 6.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,469 HTML elements

    The page has 3,469 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 MB

    14 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 379 KiB

    29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (379 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 346 ms

    346 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 346 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Shopify adds 220 ms

    220 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 220 ms of main-thread work and 505 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 152 ms

    152 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 152 ms of main-thread work and 343 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 238 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.3 s

    20.3 s

    Your largest element takes 20.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Videos of models smiling and wearing Lanolips Ceramide Milk…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.3 s

    24.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 391 ms

    391 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 391 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Real visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 470 ms

    470 ms

    Real visitors wait 470 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 32.6 MB in 445 requests

    32.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 32.6 MB in 445 requests on a phone: media 25.6 MB (2), images 3.5 MB (61) and scripts 1.9 MB (124). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    bcb2bb7f-38c3-4b04-a340-04b1d71bf085.jpeg weighs 510 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (510 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    144 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example main-product-shot-lanolips-glossy-balm-candy-image.png at 1,576 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 144 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (55 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 9.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    9.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.23 g of CO₂e: 1108.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9695
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 50 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 56 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 56 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 146 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 146 pages on lanolips.com and 11 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Looking for the world's best lip balm? All our products are made with a deeply moisturizing, natural lanolin. Shop our …”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Makers of the World's Best Natural Lip Balm – Lanolips USA Store”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lanolips.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lanolips.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and Applebot-Extended, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,093 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://lanolips.com/llms.txt (16 KiB, 64 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://lanolips.com/products/101-dry-skin-super-cream-multipurpose-for-face-body, whose canonical is https://lanolips.com/products/101-dry-skin-super-cream. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9278
  • 9 broken images

    9 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn-yotpo-images-production.yotpo.com/Product/777961174/654427941/square.jpg?1793323017.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    41 of 50 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 925 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 925 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now - 101 Delicious” and “Subscribe”.

  • 26 calls to action

    The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “Shop Lip Products” and “Shop Lip Collections”.

  • 21 short forms

    21 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 45 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lanolips.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 16 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Checkmate · Microsoft Clarity · Selecty · Consentik Cookie · Yotpo Product Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Bundler Bundles App · Consentik Ex · Bestpush · Freegifts · herokuapp.com · ga4app.com · nice-team.net · rakutenadvertising.io · bogos.io · pushowl.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Sydney

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on lanolips.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25