Website review, no card needed

larissa.co.id logo

larissa.co.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202649 issues · 89 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on larissa.co.id, 20 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
250 ms100 msMay 9Oct 24233 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026129 ms
May 16, 2026134 ms
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026127 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026124 ms
Jun 27, 2026127 ms
Jul 4, 2026126 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026119 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026120 ms
Sep 19, 2026122 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026131 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026180 ms
Oct 24, 2026233 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of larissa.co.id (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. larissa.co.id at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. larissa.co.id at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. larissa.co.id at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. larissa.co.id at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. larissa.co.id at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. larissa.co.id at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. larissa.co.id at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. larissa.co.id at 7.5 s7.5 s

Speed

10 to fix50
  • Improve image delivery

    8.8 s · 11.1 MB

    17 images could be 11.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    6.2 s

    37 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.2 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 642 KiB

    About 642 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.2 s · 1.7 MB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    3.2 s · 469 KiB

    About 469 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify CSS

    760 ms · 97 KiB

    97 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    850 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 967 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,723 HTML elements

    The page has 1,723 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, TikTok and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1,012 KiB and 365 ms of main-thread time.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 ms · 23 KiB

    23 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 81 ms

    81 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 81 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Real visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 76.9 s

    76.9 s

    Your largest element takes 76.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Slider Larissa Aesthetic Center”.

  • Time to Interactive: 81.3 s

    81.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 81.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 245 ms

    245 ms

    Real visitors wait 245 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.25

    0.25

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.25 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 57% slower for real visitors

    +57%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 233 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 277 ms

    277 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 277 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user TTFB: 671 ms

    671 ms

    Real visitors wait 671 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 20.0 MB in 170 requests

    20.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.0 MB in 170 requests on a phone: images 17.3 MB (56), scripts 1.3 MB (57) and fonts 771 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 14 images over 500 KB

    14 images weigh 14.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 20 images far larger than shown

    8.6 MB

    20 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20261015131606-bio-pigmentation-light-therapy.png at 1,254 px wide, shown at 264 px. Resized copies would save about 8.6 MB.

  • 22 images in older formats

    22 images (15.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 20 images below the first screen load straight away

    20 images further down the page (13.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    1792564459-mobile-54zTv.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 5.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.67 g of CO₂e: 681.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7987
  • 39 text elements with low contrast

    39 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (63 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 63 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 65 links without text

    65 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 70 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9277
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (79 characters)

    Your title is 79 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Klinik Kecantikan Natural & Perawatan Kulit Estetika - Larissa Aesthetic Center”.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://larissa.co.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 12 links crawlers can't follow

    12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 102 internal links, 58 external

    The homepage links to 102 pages on larissa.co.id and 58 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “Larissa Aesthetic Center merupakan klinik kecantikan estetika pertama di Indonesia dengan konsep Natural Back to Nature…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://larissa.co.id/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: MedicalBusiness and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://larissa.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (791 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://larissa.co.id/faq, https://larissa.co.id/karir and https://larissa.co.id/produk/osn-after-acne-regeneration-booster-serum use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://larissa.co.id/kontak, https://larissa.co.id/karir, https://larissa.co.id/produk/osn-acne-serum and https://larissa.co.id/produk/osn-after-acne-regeneration-booster-serum have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 616 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 616 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Tiktok shop”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at larissa.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Google Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on larissa.co.id, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25