Website review, no card needed

larian.com logo

larian.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202635 issues · 86 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on larian.com, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
105 ms96 msMay 9Oct 24104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202698 ms
May 16, 202699 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 202698 ms
Jun 13, 202697 ms
Jun 20, 202698 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 202698 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 2026100 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026102 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 2026102 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of larian.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. larian.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. larian.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. larian.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. larian.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. larian.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. larian.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. larian.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. larian.com at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

4 to fix65
  • Improve image delivery

    41.0 s · 15.3 MB

    35 images could be 15.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 41.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 55). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    480 ms · 281 KiB

    About 281 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 75 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (75 KiB).

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and digitaloceanspaces.com), adding 168 KiB and 95 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 106 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    10 KiB

    About 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 411 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 165 ms

    165 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 165 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 76.6 s

    76.6 s

    Your largest element takes 76.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 77.0 s

    77.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 77.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 98 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Real visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 84 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 27.1 MB in 83 requests

    27.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 27.1 MB in 83 requests on a phone: images 26.1 MB (67), scripts 747 KiB (11) and fonts 189 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (544 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    114 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shop.png at 1,440 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 114 KiB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (369 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 7.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    7.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.68 g of CO₂e: 922.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 6284
  • 11 buttons without a name

    11 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Required ARIA attributes must be provided (4 elements)

    Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (4 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Positive tabindex

    2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (38 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 38 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (13 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 11 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8365
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (25 characters)

    Your title is only 25 characters: “Homepage - Larian Studios”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“The gods are silent. Rivellon bleeds. New powers …”, “DIVINITY: ORIGINAL SIN - THE BOARDGAME” and “BALDUR'S GATE 3 DELUXE EDITION”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://larian.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 36 internal links, 54 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on larian.com and 54 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://larian.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,300 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://larian.com/careers, https://larian.com/press, https://larian.com/support, https://larian.com/news, https://larian.com/contact and https://larian.com/careers/c0eba700-cfdb-4481-acf2-063f5772d5d8 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    53 of 54 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,123 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,123 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BUY NOW” and “Learn more about our privacy policy.”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact details”, “Contact” and “Buy now”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 5 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at larian.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
77 open roles
Teams
Engine Programming (9), Graphics Programming (7), Gameplay Programming (6), Tools Programming (5)
Job board
lever

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on larian.com, including 10 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25