Website review, no card needed

lbst.dk logo

lbst.dk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202628 issues · 75 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on lbst.dk, 12 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
97 ms89 msMay 9Oct 2494 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202694 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202694 ms
Jun 13, 202692 ms
Jun 20, 202693 ms
Jun 27, 202690 ms
Jul 4, 202693 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 202694 ms
Aug 29, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 202694 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lbst.dk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lbst.dk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. lbst.dk at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. lbst.dk at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. lbst.dk at 4.3 s4.3 s
  5. lbst.dk at 5.4 s5.4 s
  6. lbst.dk at 6.5 s6.5 s
  7. lbst.dk at 7.6 s7.6 s
  8. lbst.dk at 8.7 s8.7 s

Speed

5 to fix48
  • Render-blocking requests

    6.3 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.3 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    4.8 s · 923 KiB

    About 923 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.6 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 82). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 125 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (125 KiB).

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (cookiebot.eu, teamviewer.com and Siteimprove), adding 262 KiB and 65 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    55 KiB

    About 55 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Document request latency

    40 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Improve image delivery

    16 KiB

    3 images could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 82 but mobile only 48. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 105 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 353 ms

    353 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 353 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    Your largest element takes 10.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “LANDBRUGSSTYRELSEN FORDELT PÅ TO NYE STYRELSER”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.5 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 814 ms

    814 ms

    Real visitors wait 814 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.181

    0.181

    The layout shifts by 0.181 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Real visitors wait 101 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 38 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 38 requests on a phone: stylesheets 975 KiB (2), fonts 695 KiB (6) and images 667 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (396 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 94.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9697
  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10086
  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “Forside - Landbrugsstyrelsen”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 140 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 140 pages on lbst.dk and 16 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Landbrugsstyrelsen arbejder med at understøtte politiske målsætninger om grøn omstilling og udvikling af landbruget ige…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Landbrugsstyrelsen fordelt på to nye styrelser”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lbst.dk/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lbst.dk/Handlers/Sitemap.ashx.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://lbst.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (671 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://lbst.dk/tast-selv-performance has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 491 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 491 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lbst.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Company

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Copenhagen

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on lbst.dk, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25