Website review, no card needed

lds.org logo

lds.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on lds.org, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s3.6 sMay 16Oct 313.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
275 ms153 msMay 16Oct 31170 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026213 ms
May 23, 2026230 ms
May 30, 2026241 ms
Jun 6, 2026246 ms
Jun 13, 2026257 ms
Jun 20, 2026261 ms
Jun 27, 2026256 ms
Jul 4, 2026254 ms
Jul 11, 2026240 ms
Jul 18, 2026235 ms
Jul 25, 2026224 ms
Aug 1, 2026206 ms
Aug 8, 2026190 ms
Aug 15, 2026175 ms
Aug 22, 2026172 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026172 ms
Sep 12, 2026172 ms
Sep 19, 2026173 ms
Sep 26, 2026175 ms
Oct 3, 2026172 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms
Oct 17, 2026169 ms
Oct 24, 2026167 ms
Oct 31, 2026170 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lds.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lds.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lds.org at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. lds.org at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. lds.org at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. lds.org at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. lds.org at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. lds.org at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. lds.org at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

9 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.0 s · 721 KiB

    About 721 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 615 KiB

    53 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (615 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (pure.cloud, Adobe Tag Manager and New Relic and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • pure.cloud adds 943 ms

    943 ms

    pure.cloud costs a phone 943 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Minify JavaScript

    590 ms · 88 KiB

    88 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 256 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 52 KiB

    6 images could be 52 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Your largest element takes 14.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Guatemala FHD Stock: Family Playing Outside”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 802 ms

    802 ms

    Real visitors wait 802 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 503 ms

    503 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 503 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 149 ms

    149 ms

    Real visitors wait 149 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.10

    0.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 213 ms to 170 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.015

    0.015

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.015, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 113 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 113 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (39), images 495 KiB (20) and fonts 133 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (190 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.68 g of CO₂e: 81.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9794
  • <html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“God Knows and Loves You” and “God Knows and Loves You”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 25 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 25 pages on lds.org and 3 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Discover a service-oriented, globally-connected Christian church that is led by a prophet of God and seeks to follow Je…”.

  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/?lang=eng.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FAQPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sitemaps.churchofjesuschrist.org/sitemap-service/www.churchofjesuschrist.org/af/index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (930 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/common-questions has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/god-loves-you, whose canonical is https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/god-loves-you?lang=eng. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/find-a-church has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/find-a-church, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/families-together-forever, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/bible-book-of-mormon-word-of-god, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/meet-with-missionaries, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/welcome/common-questions and https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/learn/people/dallin-h-oaks/life-leadership and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 459 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 459 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “The Book of Mormon” and “Request a Visit”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: TrustArc

    A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lds.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Company

Founded
1830
Headquarters
Salt Lake City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on lds.org, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25