Website review, no card needed
le-bernardin.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202650 issues · 82 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on le-bernardin.com, 27 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 121 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.2 s · 12.1 MB54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.1 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.4 s · 912 KiBAbout 912 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.8 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 90). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,539 HTML elements
The page has 3,539 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Maps and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 659 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 243 KiB3 images could be 243 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 401 ms
401 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 401 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 493 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
240 ms · 13 KiBAbout 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 240 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 90 but mobile only 41. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 59 ms
59 msYour server sent the HTML in 59 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.46
0.46For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.46 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.6 s
16.6 sYour largest element takes 16.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “div.undefined”.
Time to Interactive: 16.6 s
16.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe first text or image appears after 5.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 739 ms
739 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 739 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 121 ms
121 msReal visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
9 images over 500 KB
9 images weigh 37.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
Page weight: 14.0 MB in 79 requests
14.0 MBYour homepage downloads 14.0 MB in 79 requests on a phone: images 11.5 MB (48), scripts 1.8 MB (17) and other files 350 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
40 images in older formats
40 images (42.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit
3.97 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.97 g of CO₂e: 476.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
22 text elements with low contrast
22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Positive tabindex
12 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (108 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 108 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (5 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Headings should not be empty (20 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (277 characters)
Your meta description is 277 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
3 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Le Bernardin by Eric Ripert | Home”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.le-bernardin.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 7,247 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.le-bernardin.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 7,247 words of copy
The homepage carries about 7,247 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at le-bernardin.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Company
- Founded
- 1972
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on le-bernardin.com, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.