Website review, no card needed

lebriochin.com logo

lebriochin.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202638 issues · 101 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on lebriochin.com, 11 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20264.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.8 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
127 ms110 msMay 2Oct 17125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026123 ms
May 9, 2026119 ms
May 16, 2026114 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026117 ms
Jun 20, 2026118 ms
Jun 27, 2026118 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026122 ms
Aug 1, 2026120 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026121 ms
Aug 22, 2026115 ms
Aug 29, 2026118 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026120 ms
Sep 19, 2026121 ms
Sep 26, 2026120 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026125 ms
Oct 17, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

11 to fix56
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 572 KiB

    About 572 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 263 KiB

    5 images could be 263 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 492 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (492 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 72). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, alcmeon.com and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.4 MB and 810 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 114 KiB

    About 114 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 569 ms

    569 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 569 ms of main-thread work and 667 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,537 HTML elements

    The page has 2,537 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • alcmeon.com adds 95 ms

    95 ms

    alcmeon.com costs a phone 95 ms of main-thread work and 440 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 235 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 56 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 115 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.8 s

    18.8 s

    Your largest element takes 18.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Acheter Le détachant avant lavage au Savon Noir”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.2 s

    20.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 519 ms

    519 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 519 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 131 ms

    131 ms

    Real visitors wait 131 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 632 ms

    632 ms

    Real visitors wait 632 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 35% faster for real visitors

    -35%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.034

    0.034

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.034, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix65
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 109 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 109 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (38), images 1.0 MB (32) and fonts 563 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (991 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    265 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1b81c17af9efe166ce0ca6d889c9e6c7.jpg at 1,500 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 265 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (247 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.93 g of CO₂e: 111.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8591
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Le Briochin : produits d'entretien, de nettoyage et de cosmétiques”.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 90 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 90 pages on lebriochin.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Le Briochin, l'artisan de votre bien-être : des produits d'entretien, de nettoyage et de cosmétiques ! Garantie fabriqu…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Entrez dans votre droguerie”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lebriochin.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lebriochin.com/1_index_sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,003 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /70-traitement-de-l-air-et-des-odeurs, /56-allume-feu and /57-nettoyants-barbecue-plancha have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 30 small tap targets

    30 of 81 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://cdn.doofinder.com/livelayer/1.8.209/css/2/common.css' from origin 'https://www.leb…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (lebriochin.com).

  • Valid certificate (48 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for lebriochin.com and is valid for another 48 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://lebriochin.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    lebriochin.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    lebriochin.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 23 years old

    23 years

    lebriochin.com was registered in Mar 2003 through Nameshield SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2027

    lebriochin.com is registered until Mar 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 692 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 692 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 8 short forms

    8 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:51.91.124.238 a ip4:80.74.64.0/24 ip4:77.87.106.173 ip4:185.227.17.41 include:spf.protection.outlook.com inc…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

E-commerce
PrestaShop

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on lebriochin.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25