Website review, no card needed

maison-colibri.com logo

maison-colibri.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202641 issues · 106 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on maison-colibri.com, 17 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
204 ms136 msMay 2Oct 17188 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026147 ms
May 9, 2026146 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026144 ms
May 30, 2026145 ms
Jun 6, 2026146 ms
Jun 13, 2026151 ms
Jun 20, 2026153 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026159 ms
Jul 11, 2026159 ms
Jul 18, 2026157 ms
Jul 25, 2026155 ms
Aug 1, 2026156 ms
Aug 8, 2026159 ms
Aug 15, 2026169 ms
Aug 22, 2026174 ms
Aug 29, 2026176 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026179 ms
Sep 19, 2026191 ms
Sep 26, 2026196 ms
Oct 3, 2026189 ms
Oct 10, 2026188 ms
Oct 17, 2026188 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of maison-colibri.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maison-colibri.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. maison-colibri.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. maison-colibri.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. maison-colibri.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. maison-colibri.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. maison-colibri.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. maison-colibri.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. maison-colibri.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

maison-colibri.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    17.2 s · 5.1 MB

    74 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    8.7 s · 2.7 MB

    5 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.0 s

    43 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 640 KiB

    About 640 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 34). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Didomi and others), adding 1.1 MB and 603 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 105 KiB

    About 105 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 306 ms

    306 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 306 ms of main-thread work and 524 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,655 HTML elements

    The page has 1,655 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 129 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 33.8 s

    33.8 s

    Your largest element takes 33.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Slide background”.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.9 s

    37.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.2 s

    14.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 35% slower for real visitors

    +35%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 816 ms

    816 ms

    Real visitors wait 816 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 195 ms

    195 ms

    Real visitors wait 195 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 149 ms

    149 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 149 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 9.4 MB in 138 requests

    9.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.4 MB in 138 requests on a phone: images 6.6 MB (22), scripts 1.4 MB (40) and other files 661 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 4.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (4.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.66 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.66 g of CO₂e: 319.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7989
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8584
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 144 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 144 pages on maison-colibri.com and 19 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Offrez un coffret cadeau 100% personnalisé et de madeleines gourmandes, made in France. Faites passer avec douceur ce q…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Cadeaux gourmands & personnalisables | Maison Colibri”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.maison-colibri.com/fr/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.maison-colibri.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (726 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /fr/nos-produits/nos-coffrets/coffret-naissance and /fr/nos-produits/nos-coffrets/petit-coffret-naissance use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /fr/nos-produits/editions-limitees/coffret-copacabana, whose canonical is /fr/nos-produits/nos-coffrets/coffret-copacabana. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '<', "<!doctype "... is not valid JSON JSON.parse (<anonymous>)”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    26 of 32 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://maison-colibri.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (maison-colibri.com).

  • Valid certificate (72 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for maison-colibri.com and is valid for another 72 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://maison-colibri.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    maison-colibri.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    maison-colibri.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 9 years old

    9 years

    maison-colibri.com was registered in Mar 2017 through Nameshield SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2028

    maison-colibri.com is registered until Mar 2028.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 485 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 485 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “SHOP EUROPE”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:et._spf.pardot…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Didomi

    A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Powered by Creative Slider 6.6.10 - Multi-Purpose, Responsiv
E-commerce
PrestaShop
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 41 issues on maison-colibri.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25