Website review, no card needed

leclerc.pl logo

leclerc.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202641 issues · 84 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on leclerc.pl, 20 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
147 ms137 msMay 9Oct 24146 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026142 ms
May 16, 2026143 ms
May 23, 2026141 ms
May 30, 2026141 ms
Jun 6, 2026141 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026139 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026140 ms
Jul 18, 2026142 ms
Jul 25, 2026143 ms
Aug 1, 2026142 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026142 ms
Aug 22, 2026144 ms
Aug 29, 2026145 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026144 ms
Sep 19, 2026144 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms
Oct 10, 2026145 ms
Oct 17, 2026145 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leclerc.pl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leclerc.pl at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. leclerc.pl at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. leclerc.pl at 3.6 s3.6 s
  4. leclerc.pl at 4.8 s4.8 s
  5. leclerc.pl at 6.0 s6.0 s
  6. leclerc.pl at 7.2 s7.2 s
  7. leclerc.pl at 8.5 s8.5 s
  8. leclerc.pl at 9.7 s9.7 s

Speed

11 to fix35
  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 5.1 MB

    38 images could be 5.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.3 s · 898 KiB

    About 898 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.2 s

    24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

  • Font display

    1.8 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.8 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 44). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.3 MB and 683 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 92 KiB

    About 92 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 333 ms

    333 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 333 ms of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 315 ms

    315 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 315 ms of main-thread work and 480 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,600 HTML elements

    The page has 1,600 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 33 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 127 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 124 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.34

    0.34

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.34 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    Your largest element takes 17.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “prażynki”.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.2 s

    30.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.2 s

    11.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.463

    0.463

    The layout shifts by 0.463 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 801 ms

    801 ms

    Real visitors wait 801 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 209 ms

    209 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 209 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 142 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

4 to fix45
  • Page weight: 8.3 MB in 99 requests

    8.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.3 MB in 99 requests on a phone: images 5.9 MB (50), scripts 1.7 MB (26) and other files 356 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    banner_ChupaChups_MADs_920x690pxMS.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (226 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.34 g of CO₂e: 280.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9391
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (2 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 17 images without alt text

    17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 36 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on leclerc.pl and 12 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Zapraszamy na zakupy do sklepów E.Leclerc. Poznaj ofertę naszych sklepów. Nasze atuty: najniższe ceny, szeroki asortyme…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “LECLERC POLSKA”.

  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “LECLERC POLSKA | Strona główna”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://leclerc.pl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://leclerc.pl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://leclerc.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (866 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://leclerc.pl/bonus, https://leclerc.pl/e-zakupy, https://leclerc.pl/przepisy, https://leclerc.pl/marki-wlasne/wiodaca-marka, https://leclerc.pl/aktualnosci and https://leclerc.pl/informacje-handlowe and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://leclerc.pl/e-zakupy, https://leclerc.pl/informacje-handlowe, https://leclerc.pl/wypozyczalnia, https://leclerc.pl/dbamy-i-mamy and https://leclerc.pl/znajdz-sklep have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to set referrer policy: The value '' is not one of 'no-referrer', 'no-referrer-when-downgrade', 'origin', 'origi…”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 853 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 853 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leclerc.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on leclerc.pl, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25