Website review, no card needed

lefaya.de logo

lefaya.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202641 issues · 86 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on lefaya.de, 22 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s3.7 sMay 16Oct 313.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.4 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.4 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.5 s
Jul 4, 20264.4 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.3 s
Jul 25, 20264.3 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.3 s
Aug 15, 20264.2 s
Aug 22, 20264.1 s
Aug 29, 20264.1 s
Sep 5, 20264.1 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.8 s
Oct 31, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
159 ms143 msMay 16Oct 31154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026157 ms
May 23, 2026155 ms
May 30, 2026153 ms
Jun 6, 2026153 ms
Jun 13, 2026153 ms
Jun 20, 2026153 ms
Jun 27, 2026152 ms
Jul 4, 2026150 ms
Jul 11, 2026145 ms
Jul 18, 2026145 ms
Jul 25, 2026145 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026146 ms
Aug 22, 2026147 ms
Aug 29, 2026148 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026151 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026149 ms
Oct 3, 2026149 ms
Oct 10, 2026154 ms
Oct 17, 2026156 ms
Oct 24, 2026156 ms
Oct 31, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lefaya.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lefaya.de at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. lefaya.de at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. lefaya.de at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. lefaya.de at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. lefaya.de at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. lefaya.de at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. lefaya.de at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. lefaya.de at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

12 to fix36
  • Improve image delivery

    4.3 s · 1.1 MB

    12 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 744 KiB

    About 744 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • amaicdn.com adds 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    amaicdn.com costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 507 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 728 KiB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (728 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (amaicdn.com, ContentSquare and Shopify and others), adding 34.4 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 236 ms

    236 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 33.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 2.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • ContentSquare adds 254 ms

    254 ms

    ContentSquare costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 167 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,014 HTML elements

    The page has 2,014 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 63 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 63 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    45 KiB

    45 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.1 s

    20.1 s

    Your largest element takes 20.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.1 s

    31.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.8 s

    12.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 128 ms

    128 ms

    Real visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 506 ms

    506 ms

    Real visitors wait 506 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 36.2 MB in 350 requests

    36.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 36.2 MB in 350 requests on a phone: media 30.0 MB (7), scripts 2.2 MB (119) and images 2.0 MB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    900 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3_3375414e-7be2-4783-81e6-8e04979a4567.png at 1,536 px wide, shown at 145 px. Resized copies would save about 900 KiB.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 10.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.25 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.25 g of CO₂e: 1230.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8691
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 24 text elements with low contrast

    24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (4 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Table header text should not be empty (1 element)

    Table header text should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

  • <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.

    <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9278
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “LEFAYA® | Offizielle Website”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 62 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 62 pages on lefaya.de and 7 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lefaya.de/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lefaya.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,940 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://lefaya.de/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://lefaya.de/products/theratex-3-in-1, https://lefaya.de/products/nurotex-pro, https://lefaya.de/pages/krankenkasse, https://lefaya.de/collections/alle-produkte and https://lefaya.de/pages/haufige-fragen have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://lefaya.de/products/theratex-3-in-1, https://lefaya.de/products/nurotex-pro and https://lefaya.de/pages/krankenkasse have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://lefaya.de/collections/alle-produkte, https://lefaya.de/pages/ueber-uns and https://lefaya.de/pages/100-tage-garantie took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 922 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 922 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 51 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lefaya.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Kaching Cart · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Judge Me Reviews · Seal Subscriptions · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Eu Cookie Bar · Yuri Facebook Multi Pixels · leadapparel.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on lefaya.de, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25