Website review, no card needed
lefaya.de website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202641 issues · 86 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on lefaya.de, 22 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #82,499 of 98,489 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #48,363 of 53,779 online storesbeats 8%
- #44,627 of 48,777 Shopify storesbeats 7%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.3 s · 1.1 MB12 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 744 KiBAbout 744 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
amaicdn.com adds 1.7 s
1.7 samaicdn.com costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 507 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 728 KiB38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (728 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.6 s
A phone's processor spends 8.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (amaicdn.com, ContentSquare and Shopify and others), adding 34.4 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 236 ms
236 msShopify costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 33.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 2.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
ContentSquare adds 254 ms
254 msContentSquare costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 167 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,014 HTML elements
The page has 2,014 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 63 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 63 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
52 KiBAbout 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
45 KiB45 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.1 s
20.1 sYour largest element takes 20.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 31.1 s
31.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s
2.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 506 ms
506 msReal visitors wait 506 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 36.2 MB in 350 requests
36.2 MBYour homepage downloads 36.2 MB in 350 requests on a phone: media 30.0 MB (7), scripts 2.2 MB (119) and images 2.0 MB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images far larger than shown
900 KiB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3_3375414e-7be2-4783-81e6-8e04979a4567.png at 1,536 px wide, shown at 145 px. Resized copies would save about 900 KiB.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 10.3 g of CO₂ per visit
10.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.25 g of CO₂e: 1230.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
24 text elements with low contrast
24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (4 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Table header text should not be empty (1 element)
Table header text should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “LEFAYA® | Offizielle Website”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
62 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on lefaya.de and 7 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://lefaya.de/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lefaya.de/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,940 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://lefaya.de/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://lefaya.de/products/theratex-3-in-1, https://lefaya.de/products/nurotex-pro, https://lefaya.de/pages/krankenkasse, https://lefaya.de/collections/alle-produkte and https://lefaya.de/pages/haufige-fragen have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://lefaya.de/products/theratex-3-in-1, https://lefaya.de/products/nurotex-pro and https://lefaya.de/pages/krankenkasse have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://lefaya.de/collections/alle-produkte, https://lefaya.de/pages/ueber-uns and https://lefaya.de/pages/100-tage-garantie took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 922 words of copy
The homepage carries about 922 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
51 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lefaya.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Kaching Cart · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Judge Me Reviews · Seal Subscriptions · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Eu Cookie Bar · Yuri Facebook Multi Pixels · leadapparel.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on lefaya.de, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.