Website review, no card needed
legacy.com.ar website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202644 issues · 87 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on legacy.com.ar, 15 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 42. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 36 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 39 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 44 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 47 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 53 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 174 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.7 s
5.3 s
8.0 s
10.7 s
13.3 s
16.0 s
18.7 s
21.3 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 75). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 5.2 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
vtexassets.com adds 984 ms
984 msvtexassets.com costs a phone 984 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 329 ms
329 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 329 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 337 ms
337 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 337 ms of main-thread work and 707 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 90 KiBAbout 90 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
228 KiB32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (228 KiB).
Improve image delivery
121 KiB4 images could be 121 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 117 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 75 but mobile only 42. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.46
0.46For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.46 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 16.4 s
16.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.7 s
9.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sYour largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.447
0.447The layout shifts by 0.447 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 369% slower for real visitors
+369%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 36 ms to 174 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 29% slower for real visitors
+29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 223 ms
223 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 223 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
1 checks passed
Real-user INP: 164 ms
164 msReal visitors wait 164 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.8 MB in 159 requests
2.8 MBYour homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 159 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (47), other files 371 KiB (76) and images 241 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (190 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (27 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.79 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.79 g of CO₂e: 94.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
5 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
6 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (ItemList and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
30 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 30 pages on legacy.com.ar and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “New Season 26/27 de Legacy: camisas, chombas, remeras, bermudas y trajes de baño para la primavera-verano. Envíos a tod…”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Tienda Online Legacy - New Season 26/27”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.legacy.com.ar/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.legacy.com.ar/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.legacy.com.ar/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.legacy.com.ar/313 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
12 pages share a meta description
https://www.legacy.com.ar/remeras, https://www.legacy.com.ar/camisas, https://www.legacy.com.ar/polos, https://www.legacy.com.ar/pantalones, https://www.legacy.com.ar/jeans-denim and https://www.legacy.com.ar/buzos--polar and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page with very little text
https://www.legacy.com.ar/chalecos has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 47 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Only about 104 words
The homepage has only about 104 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks and 4 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at legacy.com.ar, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on legacy.com.ar, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.