Website review, no card needed
leverages.jp website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202648 issues · 87 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on leverages.jp, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 207 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 176 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.9 s · 3.6 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).
Improve image delivery
6.3 s · 2.2 MB14 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.8 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
6.6 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.6 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 189 KiBAbout 189 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 20
20/100Your mobile performance score is 20 (desktop: 14). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.6 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 904 ms
904 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 904 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
750 ms · 99 KiB99 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Main-thread work: 3.9 s
A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google CDN adds 263 ms
263 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
70 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify CSS
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 18 ms
18 msYour server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.76
0.76For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.76 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 15.2 s
15.2 sThe first text or image appears after 15.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.4 s
32.4 sYour largest element takes 32.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 15.5 s
15.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 35.5 s
35.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.719
0.719The layout shifts by 0.719 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 483 ms
483 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 483 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 195 ms
195 msReal visitors wait 195 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 789 ms
789 msReal visitors wait 789 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 207 ms to 176 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.0 MB in 165 requests
9.0 MBYour homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 165 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (43), scripts 2.8 MB (37) and fonts 972 KiB (43). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images far larger than shown
565 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example cm-thumbnail-2023-01.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 324 px. Resized copies would save about 565 KiB.
15 images in older formats
15 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.55 g of CO₂e: 306.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “レバレジーズ株式会社”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://leverages.jp/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
31 internal links, 45 external
The homepage links to 31 pages on leverages.jp and 45 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 81 characters
Your meta description is 81 characters: “レバレジーズ(Leverages)は「顧客の創造を通じて関係者全員の幸福を追求し、各個人の成長を促す」を理念に掲げ、国や業界を絞らずに多様な事業を展開しています。”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://leverages.jp/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://leverages.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (150 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://leverages.jp/business, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1020/6279, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1013/6264, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1013/6251, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1008/6248 and https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1006/6220 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://leverages.jp/20th has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages with very little text
https://leverages.jp/global, https://leverages.jp/recruit, https://leverages.jp/news, https://leverages.jp/contact, https://leverages.jp/sitemap and https://leverages.jp/privacypolicy and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
32 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 162 words
The homepage has only about 162 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “CONTACT”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leverages.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2019.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 2005
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on leverages.jp, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.