Website review, no card needed

leverages.jp logo

leverages.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202648 issues · 87 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on leverages.jp, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
239 ms168 msMay 2Oct 17176 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026207 ms
May 9, 2026200 ms
May 16, 2026197 ms
May 23, 2026194 ms
May 30, 2026190 ms
Jun 6, 2026188 ms
Jun 13, 2026195 ms
Jun 20, 2026195 ms
Jun 27, 2026193 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026188 ms
Jul 18, 2026195 ms
Jul 25, 2026210 ms
Aug 1, 2026214 ms
Aug 8, 2026224 ms
Aug 15, 2026231 ms
Aug 22, 2026220 ms
Aug 29, 2026221 ms
Sep 5, 2026223 ms
Sep 12, 2026212 ms
Sep 19, 2026207 ms
Sep 26, 2026198 ms
Oct 3, 2026185 ms
Oct 10, 2026179 ms
Oct 17, 2026176 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leverages.jp (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leverages.jp at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. leverages.jp at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. leverages.jp at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. leverages.jp at 3.1 s3.1 s
  5. leverages.jp at 3.8 s3.8 s
  6. leverages.jp at 4.6 s4.6 s
  7. leverages.jp at 5.3 s5.3 s
  8. leverages.jp at 6.1 s6.1 s

Speed

11 to fix20
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.9 s · 3.6 MB

    49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    6.3 s · 2.2 MB

    14 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.8 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    6.6 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.6 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 189 KiB

    About 189 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 20

    20/100

    Your mobile performance score is 20 (desktop: 14). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.6 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 904 ms

    904 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 904 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    750 ms · 99 KiB

    99 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google CDN adds 263 ms

    263 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    70 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.76

    0.76

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.76 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 32.4 s

    32.4 s

    Your largest element takes 32.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.5 s

    35.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.719

    0.719

    The layout shifts by 0.719 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 483 ms

    483 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 483 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 195 ms

    195 ms

    Real visitors wait 195 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 789 ms

    789 ms

    Real visitors wait 789 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 207 ms to 176 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 9.0 MB in 165 requests

    9.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 165 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (43), scripts 2.8 MB (37) and fonts 972 KiB (43). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 9 images far larger than shown

    565 KiB

    9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example cm-thumbnail-2023-01.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 324 px. Resized copies would save about 565 KiB.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.55 g of CO₂e: 306.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7285
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9281
  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “レバレジーズ株式会社”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://leverages.jp/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 31 internal links, 45 external

    The homepage links to 31 pages on leverages.jp and 45 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 81 characters

    Your meta description is 81 characters: “レバレジーズ(Leverages)は「顧客の創造を通じて関係者全員の幸福を追求し、各個人の成長を促す」を理念に掲げ、国や業界を絞らずに多様な事業を展開しています。”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://leverages.jp/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://leverages.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (150 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://leverages.jp/business, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1020/6279, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1013/6264, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1013/6251, https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1008/6248 and https://leverages.jp/news/2026/1006/6220 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://leverages.jp/20th has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 12 pages with very little text

    https://leverages.jp/global, https://leverages.jp/recruit, https://leverages.jp/news, https://leverages.jp/contact, https://leverages.jp/sitemap and https://leverages.jp/privacypolicy and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    32 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 162 words

    The homepage has only about 162 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “CONTACT”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 32 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leverages.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2019.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2005

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on leverages.jp, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25